ArticlePhysical & occupational therapy in geriatrics2021
Validity of Instrumented 360° Turn Test in Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment.
Article in Physical & occupational therapy in geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Floor-Hugging intervention: findings from an exploratory study of a novel floor-exposure and post-fall contingency program.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Validity and Reliability of the Timed 360° Turn Test in Individuals with Ankle Sprain.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Beyond timing and step counting in 360° turning-in-place assessment: a scoping review.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo examine concurrent and construct validity of inertial sensor 360°turn measures in relation with motion capture and mobility assessments in cognitively impaired older adults.
methodsData was collected in 31 participants, mean age 85.2 (
resultsAbsolute agreement between inertial sensor and motion capture measures was excellent for turn duration and turn peak velocity (ICC = 0.96-0.98). Strong to moderate correlations were present between inertial sensor turn measures and performance on the Timed Up and Go, Short Physical Performance Battery and 90-s Balance Test. ROC curve analysis of CCW 360° turn duration and turn peak velocity distinguished higher risk versus lower risk for mobility disability.
conclusionsInertial sensor 360° turn measures demonstrated concurrent and construct validity in relation to motion capture and mobility assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.