Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34304604›Full record

ArticleStroke2021

Balancing Benefits and Risks of Long-Term Antiplatelet Therapy in Noncardioembolic Transient Ischemic Attack or Stroke.

Nina A Hilkens, Ale Algra, Hans Christoph Diener, Philip M Bath, László Csiba, Werner Hacke, L Jaap Kappelle, Peter J Koudstaal, Didier Leys, Jean-Louis Mas and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Long-term outcomes in the pre-moyamoya stage ofThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Predictive Value of Platelet Aggregation Tests in Recurrent Cerebral Ischemia and Major Bleeding.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Nina A HilkensJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (N.A.H., A.A., J.P.G.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7757-6724
Ale AlgraJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (N.A.H., A.A., J.P.G.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2858-5808
Hans Christoph DienerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Germany (H.C.D.).
Philip M BathStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom (P.M.B.).
László CsibaDepartment of Neurology, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center, Hungary (L.C.).ORCID 0000-0003-3273-8555
Werner HackeDepartment of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Germany (W.H.).
L Jaap KappelleDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus (A.A., L.J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
Peter J KoudstaalDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (P.J.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-4998-9609
Didier LeysDepartment of Neurology, University of Lille, INSERM U 1171, CHU l, Lille, France (D.L.).
Jean-Louis MasDepartment of Neurology, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Université Paris Descartes, France (J.-L.M.).
Ralph L SaccoDepartment of Neurology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, FL (R.L.S.).
Jacoba P GrevingJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (N.A.H., A.A., J.P.G.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8533-2175
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC · NLEssen University Hospital · DEHeidelberg University · DEInserm · FRRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Debrecen · HUUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Lifelong treatment with antiplatelet drugs is recommended following a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke. Bleeding complications may offset the benefit of antiplatelet drugs in patients at increased risk of bleeding and low risk of recurrent ischemic events. We aimed to investigate the net benefit of antiplatelet treatment according to an individuals’ bleeding risk. Methods: We pooled individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials (CAPRIE [Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events], ESPS-2 [European Stroke Prevention Study-2], MATCH [Management of Atherothrombosis With Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients], CHARISMA [Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance], ESPRIT [European/Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial], and PRoFESS [Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes]) investigating antiplatelet therapy in the subacute or chronic phase after noncardioembolic transient ischemic attack or stroke. Patients were stratified into quintiles according to their predicted risk of major bleeding with the S2TOP-BLEED score. The annual risk of major bleeding and recurrent ischemic events was assessed per quintile for 4 scenarios: (1) aspirin monotherapy, (2) aspirin-clopidogrel versus aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy, (3) aspirin-dipyridamole versus clopidogrel, and (4) aspirin versus clopidogrel. Net benefit was calculated for the second, third, and fourth scenario. Results: Thirty seven thousand eighty-seven patients were included in the analyses. Both risk of major bleeding and recurrent ischemic events increased over quintiles of predicted bleeding risk, but risk of ischemic events was consistently higher (eg, from 0.7%/y (bottom quintile) to 3.2%/y (top quintile) for major bleeding on aspirin and from 2.5%/y to 10.2%/y for risk of ischemic events on aspirin). Treatment with aspirin-clopidogrel led to more major bleedings (0.9%–1.7% per year), than reduction in ischemic events (ranging from 0.4% to 0.9/1.0% per year) across all quintiles. There was no clear preference for either aspirin-dipyridamole or clopidogrel according to baseline bleeding risk. Conclusions: Among patients with a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke included in clinical trials of antiplatelet therapy, the risk of recurrent ischemic events and of major bleeding increase in parallel. Antiplatelet treatment cannot be individualized solely based on bleeding risk assessment.

Indexed as

AspirinClopidogrelDipyridamoleDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesIschemic Attack, TransientPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceRisk AssessmentStrokeTiclopidineTreatment OutcomeAspirinClopidogrelDipyridamolePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidineaspirinclopidogrelischemic attack, transientrisksecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID34304604
PMCPMC8478107
OpenAlexW3186265479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.