Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34304593›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

Expanding the classical paradigm: what we have learnt from vertebrates about sex chromosome evolution.

Lukáš Kratochvíl, Matthias Stöck, Michail Rovatsos, Mónica Bullejos, Amaury Herpin, Daniel L Jeffries, Catherine L Peichel, Nicolas Perrin, Nicole Valenzuela, Martina Johnson Pokorná

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Repeatome Dynamics and Sex Chromosome Differentiation in the XY and XYInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Disruption of Sex-LinkedBiomolecules · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lukáš KratochvílDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague, Czech Republic.
Matthias StöckLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries - IGB (Forschungsverbund Berlin), Müggelseedamm 301, 12587 Berlin, Germany.
Michail RovatsosDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague, Czech Republic.
Mónica BullejosDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Jaén, Las Lagunillas Campus S/N, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
Amaury HerpinINRAE, LPGP, 35000 Rennes, France.
Daniel L JeffriesDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catherine L PeichelInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Nicolas PerrinDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicole ValenzuelaDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Martina Johnson PokornáDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, the field of sex chromosome evolution has been dominated by the canonical unidirectional scenario, first developed by Muller in 1918. This model postulates that sex chromosomes emerge from autosomes by acquiring a sex-determining locus. Recombination reduction then expands outwards from this locus, to maintain its linkage with sexually antagonistic/advantageous alleles, resulting in Y or W degeneration and potentially culminating in their disappearance. Based mostly on empirical vertebrate research, we challenge and expand each conceptual step of this canonical model and present observations by numerous experts in two parts of a theme issue of

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSex Determination ProcessesAnimalsSex ChromosomesVertebratesevolutionsex chromosomessex determinationvertebrates

Identifiers

PMID34304593
PMCPMC8310716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.