Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34304587›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

Do male and female heterogamety really differ in expression regulation? Lack of global dosage balance in pygopodid geckos.

Michail Rovatsos, Tony Gamble, Stuart V Nielsen, Arthur Georges, Tariq Ezaz, Lukáš Kratochvíl

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Sex chromosome evolution among amniotes: is the origin of sex chromosomes non-random?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Expanding the classical paradigm: what we have learnt from vertebrates about sex chromosome evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Whole-chromosome fusions in the karyotype evolution ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. A brief review of vertebrate sex evolution with a pledge for integrative research: towards 'Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Preface.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 7 countries.

Michail RovatsosDepartment of Ecology, Charles University, Prague, CZ 12844, Czech Republic.
Tony GambleDepartment of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
Stuart V NielsenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
Arthur GeorgesInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2617, Australia.
Tariq EzazInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2617, Australia.
Lukáš KratochvílDepartment of Ecology, Charles University, Prague, CZ 12844, Czech Republic.
Marquette University · USUniversity of Canberra · AUWashington State Department of Ecology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiation of sex chromosomes is thought to have evolved with cessation of recombination and subsequent loss of genes from the degenerated partner (Y and W) of sex chromosomes, which in turn leads to imbalance of gene dosage between sexes. Based on work with traditional model species, theory suggests that unequal gene copy numbers lead to the evolution of mechanisms to counter this imbalance. Dosage compensation, or at least achieving dosage balance in expression of sex-linked genes between sexes, has largely been documented in lineages with male heterogamety (XX/XY sex determination), while ZZ/ZW systems are assumed to be usually associated with the lack of chromosome-wide gene dose regulatory mechanisms. Here, we document that although the pygopodid geckos evolved male heterogamety with a degenerated Y chromosome 32-72 Ma, one species in particular, Burton's legless lizard (

Indexed as

Dosage Compensation, GeneticGene Expression RegulationAnimalsFemaleLizardsMaleSex Chromosomesdosage compensationGekkotareptilesRNA-seqsex chromosomessex determination

Identifiers

PMID34304587
PMCPMC8310713
OpenAlexW3184793058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.