ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2022
Performance of quantitative CT texture analysis in differentiation of gastric tumors.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- Relationship between imaging, clinical, pathological features, and alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer: diagnostic performance of enhanced CT conventional features.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Applications for Head and Neck MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023Review
- Gastric morphological type: A supplementary addition for the evaluation of gastric cancer.Oncology letters · 2023Article
- Computed Tomography Texture Features and Risk Factor Analysis of Postoperative Recurrence of Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer after Radical Treatment under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine the computed tomography (CT) images of patients with a diagnosis of gastric tumor by texture analysis and to investigate its place in differential diagnosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsContrast enhanced venous phase CT images of 163 patients with pathological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 125), gastric lymphoma (n = 12) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (n = 26) were retrospectively analyzed. Pixel size adjustment, gray-level discretization and gray-level normalization procedures were applied as pre-processing steps. Region of interest (ROI) was determined from the axial slice that represented the largest lesion area and a total of 40 texture features were calculated for each patient. Texture features were compared between the tumor subtypes and between adenocarcinoma grades. Statistically significant texture features were combined into a single parameter by logistic regression analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of these features and the combined parameter were measured to differentiate tumor subtypes by receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.
resultsClassifications between adenocarcinoma versus lymphoma, adenocarcinoma vs. gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma versus poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma using texture features yielded successful results with high sensitivity (98, 91, 96%, respectively) and specificity (75, 77, 80%, respectively).
conclusionsCT texture analysis is a non-invasive promising method for classifying gastric tumors and predicting gastric adenocarcinoma differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34304383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.