Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34304361›Full record

ReviewPituitary2021

Safety of growth hormone (GH) treatment in GH deficient children and adults treated for cancer and non-malignant intracranial tumors-a review of research and clinical practice.

Margaret C S Boguszewski, Adriane A Cardoso-Demartini, Cesar Luiz Boguszewski, Wassim Chemaitilly, Claire E Higham, Gudmundur Johannsson, Kevin C J Yuen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Margaret C S BoguszewskiDepartamento de Pediatria, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Avenida Agostinho Leão Junior, 285 - Alto da Glória, Curitiba, PR, 80030-110, Brazil. margabogus@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5306-0715
Adriane A Cardoso-DemartiniDepartamento de Pediatria, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6772-1940
Cesar Luiz BoguszewskiSEMPR, Serviço de Endocrinologia e Metabologia, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7285-7941
Wassim ChemaitillyDepartments of Pediatric Medicine-Endocrinology and Epidemiology-Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0717-5076
Claire E HighamDepartment of Endocrinology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-9743
Gudmundur JohannssonDepartment of Endocrinology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3484-8440
Kevin C J YuenBarrow Pituitary Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Departments of Neuroendocrinology and Neurosurgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine and Creighton School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8169-2728
Hospital de Clínicas Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRBarrow Neurological Institute · USManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBSahlgrenska University Hospital · SESt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals surviving cancer and brain tumors may experience growth hormone (GH) deficiency as a result of tumor growth, surgical resection and/or radiotherapy involving the hypothalamic-pituitary region. Given the pro-mitogenic and anti-apoptotic properties of GH and insulin-like growth factor-I, the safety of GH replacement in this population has raised hypothetical safety concerns that have been debated for decades. Data from multicenter studies with extended follow-up have generally not found significant associations between GH replacement and cancer recurrence or mortality from cancer among childhood cancer survivors. Potential associations with secondary neoplasms, especially solid tumors, have been reported, although this risk appears to decline with longer follow-up. Data from survivors of pediatric or adult cancers who are treated with GH during adulthood are scarce, and the risk versus benefit profile of GH replacement of this population remains unclear. Studies pertaining to the safety of GH replacement in individuals treated for nonmalignant brain tumors, including craniopharyngioma and non-functioning pituitary adenoma, have generally been reassuring with regards to the risk of tumor recurrence. The present review offers a summary of the most current medical literature regarding GH treatment of patients who have survived cancer and brain tumors, with the emphasis on areas where active research is required and where consensus on clinical practice is lacking.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDwarfism, PituitaryHuman Growth HormonePituitary NeoplasmsAdultChildGrowth HormoneHumansGrowth HormoneHuman Growth HormoneCancer survivorChildhood cancer survivorGrowth hormone deficiencyGrowth hormone safety

Identifiers

PMID34304361
PMCPMC8416866
OpenAlexW3184440883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.