Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34304356›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Dynamics of bacterial and archaeal communities along the composting of tannery sludge.

Ademir Sergio Ferreira Araujo, Arthur Prudêncio de Araujo de Pereira, Jadson Emanuel Lopes Antunes, Louise Melo de Souza Oliveira, Wanderley José de Melo, Sandra Mara Barbosa Rocha, Marineide Rodrigues do Amorim, Fabio Fernando Araujo, Vania Maria Maciel Melo, Lucas William Mendes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Soybean-Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ademir Sergio Ferreira AraujoSoil Quality Lab., Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil. asfaruaj@yahoo.com.br.
Arthur Prudêncio de Araujo de PereiraSoil Science Department, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Jadson Emanuel Lopes AntunesSoil Quality Lab., Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Louise Melo de Souza OliveiraSoil Quality Lab., Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Wanderley José de MeloTechnology Department, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Sandra Mara Barbosa RochaSoil Quality Lab., Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Marineide Rodrigues do AmorimSoil Quality Lab., Agricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Fabio Fernando AraujoUniversity of West São Paulo, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil.
Vania Maria Maciel MeloLaboratory of Microbial Ecology and Biotechnology, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Lucas William MendesCellular and Molecular Laboratory, Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 305069/2018-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of composting has been proposed as a biological alternative to improve the quality of tannery sludge (TS) by the action of microbial communities. However, there is limited knowledge about the dynamic of these microbial communities during the composting process. This study assessed the responses of bacterial and archaeal communities during TS composting using the 16S rRNA sequencing. The composting process occurred within 90 days, and samples of compost were collected on day 7 (d7; mesophilic stage), 30 (d30; thermophilic stage), 60 (d60; cooling stage), and 90 (d90; maturation stage). The results showed a succession of microbial phyla during the composting with enrichment of Synergistetes, WS1, and Euryarchaeota at the mesophilic stage, while at the thermophilic stage, there was an enrichment of Hydrogenedentes, WPS-2, Chloroflexi, and Deinococcus-Thermus. At the cooling stage, there was an enrichment of Kiritimatiellaeota, and at the maturation stage, there was an enrichment of Entotheonellaeota, Dadabacteria, Nitrospirae, Dependiatiae, and Fibrobacteres. When analyzing the drivers influencing microbial communities, Cr and pH presented more negative correlations with general phyla. In contrast, S, C, K, temperature, and N presented more positive correlations, while Ni, Cd, and P showed fewer correlations. According to niche occupancy, we observed a decreased proportion of generalists with a consequently increased proportion of specialists following the composting process. This study showed that different stages of the composting present a specific microbial community structure and dynamics, which are related to some specific composting characteristics.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaCompostingIndustrial WasteRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSewageSoilTanningIndustrial WasteRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSewageSoil16S rRNAIndustrial wasteMicrobial ecologyMicrobiomeWaste management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.