Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34304312›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines?

Ava Armani, Sasha Douglas, Swati Kulkarni, Anne Wallace, Sarah Blair

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Addressing the problem of overtreatment in breast cancer.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ava ArmaniDepartment of Surgery, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. avhosseini@ucsd.edu.
Sasha DouglasDepartment of Surgery, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Swati KulkarniDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anne WallaceDepartment of Surgery, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sarah BlairDepartment of Surgery, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
University of California, San Diego · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

UCSD Cancer Center Training Program in Drug DevelopmentT32CA121938 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Michael Bouvet, Dwayne G. Stupack · 2006 to 2026
$10.3M
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health T32CA121938NCI NIH HHS T32 CA121938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been the standard of care for clinically node-negative women with invasive breast cancer (IBC); however, there is less agreement on whether to perform SLNB when the risk of metastasis is low or when it does not affect survival or locoregional control.

methodsAn Institutional Review Board-approved survey was sent to members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons asking in which scenarios surgeons would recommend SLNB. Descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were performed using SPSS software.

resultsThere was a 23% response rate; 68% identified as breast surgical oncologists, 6% as surgical oncologists, 24% as general surgeons, and 2% as other. The majority practiced in a community setting (71%) versus an academic setting (29%). In a healthy female with clinical T1N0 hormone receptor-positive (HR+) IBC, 83% favored SLNB if the patient was 75 years of age, versus 35% if the patient was 85 years of age. Academic surgeons were less likely to perform axillary staging in a healthy 75-year-old (odds ratio [OR] 0.51 [0.32-0.80], p = 0.004) or a healthy 85-year-old (OR 0.48 [0.31-0.74], p = 0.001). For DCIS, 32% endorsed SLNB in women undergoing lumpectomy, with breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons being less likely to endorse this procedure (OR 0.54 [0.36-0.82], p = 0.028; and OR 0.53 [0.34-0.83], p = 0.005, respectively).

conclusionsDespite studies showing that omitting SLNB in older patients with HR+ IBC does not impact regional control or survival, most surgeons are still opting for axillary staging. In addition, one in three are performing SLNB for lumpectomies for DCIS. Breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons were more likely to be practicing based on recent data and guidelines. Practice patterns are changing but there is still room for improvement.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSurgeonsAgedAged, 80 and overAxillaFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm StagingSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34304312
PMCPMC8418590
OpenAlexW3186522716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.