Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34304296›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Results and clinical aspects of primary endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone tube.

Victoria Miragall, Jens Oeken, Christian Güldner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Behavior and outcomes of 141 acquired lacrimal sac mucoceles treatedInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  3. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victoria MiragallDepartment of ENT, Head- and Neck-Surgery, Medical Center of Chemnitz, Flemmingstraße 2, 09116, Chemnitz, Germany. v.miragall@skc.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5605-8696
Jens OekenDepartment of ENT, Head- and Neck-Surgery, Medical Center of Chemnitz, Flemmingstraße 2, 09116, Chemnitz, Germany.
Christian GüldnerDepartment of ENT, Head- and Neck-Surgery, Medical Center of Chemnitz, Flemmingstraße 2, 09116, Chemnitz, Germany.
Klinikum Chemnitz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a common treatment for saccal and post-saccal stenosis of the lacrimal pathway or chronic dacryocystitis (DC). The main symptom is chronic epiphora (tearing) and dacryocystitis (infection). The objective of this study is to assess the short-term surgical result of this treatment based on possible prognostic factors; such as gender, age, the pathogen spectrum and the histopathological result as well as the influence of these parameters on hospital stay.

methodsIt is a retrospective analysis, which includes 197 cases in 177 patients, who received an endonasal endoscopic DCR with a silicone tube between January 2009 and December 2016, as primary procedure. The follow-up was carried out 3 months after the surgery, with the silicone tube being removed as part of the last examination including a flushing of the tear ducts with saline. This procedure is part of determining to measure the short-term success of the intervention. The definition of success of the surgery is an absence of epiphora or an acute infection of the nasolacrimal duct system, as well as an absent reflux in case of flushing the tear duct.

resultsThe success rate was 86.3% (N = 170). Higher incidence was seen in females (N = 146; 74.1%) and patients with a mean age of 65.4 (± 17.2). The presence of pathogens as well as the histopathological result do not have an impact on the short-term surgical success. Patients diagnosed with rheumatic diseases appear to have a worse prognosis with relation to procedure success. Also, the length of hospital stay was related to possible prognostic factors. Type II diabetes and glaucoma had a significant influence on a longer hospital stay.

conclusionThe endonasal endoscopic DCR is a surgical procedure with high success rate. Patients with rheumatic diseases should be aware of increased failure rates. Patients with glaucoma and Type II diabetes might need a more intense aftercare.

Indexed as

DacryocystitisDacryocystorhinostomyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2GlaucomaLacrimal Apparatus DiseasesNasolacrimal DuctRheumatic DiseasesAgedEndoscopyFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesSiliconesTreatment OutcomeSiliconesDacryocystorhinostomyDCREndonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomyEpiphoraLacrimal pathway

Identifiers

PMID34304296
OpenAlexW3183747975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.