Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34304150›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

Predicting Patients' Intention to Use a Personal Health Record Using an Adapted Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model: Secondary Data Analysis.

Consuela Cheriece Yousef, Teresa M Salgado, Ali Farooq, Keisha Burnett, Laura E McClelland, Abin Thomas, Ahmed O Alenazi, Laila Carolina Abu Esba, Aeshah AlAzmi, Abrar Fahad Alhameed and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Consuela Cheriece YousefPharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6386-7582
Teresa M SalgadoDepartment of Pharmacotherapy & Outcome Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2708-7145
Ali FarooqDepartment of Computing, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4864-3155
Keisha BurnettDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Cytopathology Practice Program, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9046-9758
Laura E McClellandDepartment of Health Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-6554
Abin ThomasDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8283-6762
Ahmed O AlenaziPharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3830-0784
Laila Carolina Abu EsbaKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2459-1485
Aeshah AlAzmiKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2761-7559
Abrar Fahad AlhameedKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9664-6783
Ahmed HattanKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-1709
Sumaya ElgadiKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6525-611X
Saleh AlmekhloofKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3249-6891
Mohammed A AlShammaryKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-1304
Nazzal Abdullah AlaneziKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4936-5727
Hani Solaiman AlhamdanKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0046-9437
Sahal KhoshhalKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4024-2819
Jonathan P DeShazoDepartment of Health Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7997-6422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the rise in the use of information and communication technologies in health care, patients have been encouraged to use eHealth tools such as personal health records (PHRs) for better health and well-being services. PHRs support patient-centered care and patient engagement. To support the achievement of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 ambitions, the National Transformation program provides a framework to use PHRs in meeting the 3-fold aim for health care-increased access, reduced cost, and improved quality of care-and to provide patient- and person-centered care. However, there has been limited research on PHR uptake within the country.

objectiveUsing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as the theoretical framework, this study aims at identifying predictors of patient intention to utilize the Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs PHR (MNGHA Care) app.

methodsUsing secondary data from a cross-sectional survey, data measuring the intention to use the MNGHA Care app, along with its predictors, were collected from among adults (n=324) visiting Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs facilities in Riyadh, Jeddah, Dammam, Madinah, Al Ahsa, and Qassim. The relationship of predictors (main theory constructs) and moderators (age, gender, and experience with health apps) with the dependent variable (intention to use MNGHA Care) was tested using hierarchical multiple regression.

resultsOf the eligible population, a total of 261 adult patients were included in the analysis. They had a mean age of 35.07 (SD 9.61) years, 50.6 % were male (n=132), 45.2% had university-level education (n=118), and 53.3% had at least 1 chronic medical condition (n=139). The model explained 48.9% of the variance in behavioral intention to use the PHR (P=.38). Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and positive attitude were significantly associated with behavioral intention to use the PHR (P<.05). Prior experience with health apps moderated the relationship between social influence and behavioral intention to use the PHR (P=.04).

conclusionsThis study contributes to the existing literature on PHR adoption broadly as well as in the context of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Understanding which factors are associated with patient adoption of PHRs can guide future development and support the country's aim of transforming the health care system. Similar to previous studies on PHR adoption, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and positive attitude are important factors, and practical consideration should be given to support these areas.

Indexed as

acceptanceeHealthelectronic health recordframeworkintentionMiddle Eastmodelpatient portalpersonal health recordpredictionSaudi Arabiasecondary analysisUnified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology

Identifiers

PMID34304150
PMCPMC8408759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.