Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34303349›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

The future of physician advocacy: a survey of U.S. medical students.

Susan Chimonas, Maha Mamoor, Anna Kaltenboeck, Deborah Korenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A socioecological framework for physician advocacy: motivators, enablers, and barriers.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Advocacy in Psychiatry.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Policy Advocacy Workshop Tools for Training Medical Students to Act on Climate Change.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan ChimonasCenter for Health Policy & Outcomes at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, 10017, USA. chimonas@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7742-5950
Maha MamoorCenter for Health Policy & Outcomes at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Anna KaltenboeckCenter for Health Policy & Outcomes at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Deborah KorensteinCenter for Health Policy & Outcomes and chief of the General Internal Medicine Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Laura and John Arnold Foundation n/aNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvocacy is a core component of medical professionalism. It is unclear how educators can best prepare trainees for this professional obligation. We sought to assess medical students' attitudes toward advocacy, including activities and issues of interest, and to determine congruence with professional obligations.

methodsA cross-sectional, web-based survey probed U.S. medical students' attitudes around 7 medical issues (e.g. nutrition/obesity, addiction) and 11 determinants of health (e.g. housing, transportation). Descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and regression analysis investigated associations with demographic characteristics.

resultsOf 240 students completing the survey, 53% were female; most were white (62%) or Asian (28%). Most agreed it is very important that physicians encourage medical organizations to advocate for public health (76%) and provide health-related expertise to the community (57%). More participants rated advocacy for medical issues as very important, compared to issues with indirect connections to health (p < 0.001). Generally, liberals and non-whites were likelier than others to value advocacy.

conclusionsMedical students reported strong interest in advocacy, particularly around health issues, consistent with professional standards. Many attitudes were associated with political affiliation and race. To optimize future physician advocacy, educators should provide opportunities for learning and engagement in issues of interest.

Indexed as

PhysiciansStudents, MedicalAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesMedical educationPhysician advocacyProfessional development

Identifiers

PMID34303349
PMCPMC8310411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.