ArticleBioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021
Real-time impedance feedback to enhance cutaneous gene electrotransfer in a murine skin model.
Article in Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrical resistance measurement in feline cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with electrochemotherapy: a pilot study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advanced electrotransfer for IL-12 gene immunotherapy in melanoma: Challenges and possibilities.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2025Article
- Effective gene immunotherapy for melanoma utilizing an advancedMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2025Article
- Transdermal Delivery of Macromolecules Using Two-in-One Nanocomposite Device for Skin Electroporation.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electric field mediated gene delivery methods have the ability to efficiently transfect cells in vivo with an excellent safety profile. The method has historically used a fixed number of electric pulses with identical characteristics in induce delivery. Electrical treatment does not typically compensate for subject-to-subject variation and other differences. This study was designed to investigate if delivery/expression could be increased using a novel electropulsation method that compensated for variation using real-time electrical impedance measurements. The method involved delivering plasmid DNA encoding luciferase to murine skin. Tissue impedance in a 1-3 KHz range was measured before electric pulses were applied. Impedance was also measured after each successive pulse. Pulsation was stopped when impedance values were reduced by either 80% or 95% relative to prepulse values. Standard/fixed pulsing parameters were also used for comparison. The results indicated that up to 15-fold increases in luciferase expression could be obtained when electrical treatment was ceased based upon impedance reductions. Furthermore, peak expression levels of all treatment groups pulsed using the novel pulsing method were statistically higher than those that employed standard pulsing. These results strongly suggest that applying pulses until a defined impedance-based endpoint results in higher expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.