SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022
Evaluating the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke patients with a history of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting 1-Hour Thrombolysis Effect of r-tPA in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Machine Learning Algorithm.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is labelled as a contraindication for the use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) based on expert opinion. However, there is a paucity of data available regarding the benefits and risks of IV-tPA in this population. Recent small retrospective cohort studies reporting its off-label use suggest it may be beneficial. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of IV-tPA in AIS patients with previous ICH. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting on IV-tPA use in AIS patients with and without previous ICH. We searched Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library from inception to 20 April 2021. Outcomes measured included symptomatic ICH (sICH), 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and 3-month mortality. We included seven retrospective cohort studies comprising 5760 AIS patients who had received IV-tPA, of which 134 had previous ICH. There was no significant difference in the odds of sICH (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.78-3.15, p = 0.21) and 3-month mRS (mRS 0-1: OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37-1.65, p = 0.52; mRS 0-2: OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.36-3.15, p = 0.90) between patients with and without previous ICH. There was a trend towards higher 3-month mortality in patients with previous ICH (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.98-2.91, p = 0.06), although this did not reach statistical significance. The use of IV-tPA in AIS patients with previous ICH was not associated with an increased risk of sICH or disability at 3 months. Further larger studies are needed to establish the safety and efficacy of IV-tPA use in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.