ArticlePituitary2022
Second-line regimen for CNS-involved pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis.
Article in Pituitary, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLangerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) can affect any organ. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is rare, and its management is poorly understood. This study aimed to analyze the clinical response and prognosis of pediatric LCH with central diabetes insipidus (CDI) treated with second-line therapy with cytarabine (Ara-c), cladribine (2-cdA), dexamethasone, and vindesine.
methodsThis retrospective case series study included pediatric LCH with CDI treated at Beijing Children's Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University (11/2012-01/2018). After the first-line 2009-LCH regimen, patients with active disease/worse response, relapse, or no significant improvement in risk organs, pituitary, or lung were given the second-line therapy. Baseline characteristics, clinical response and adverse reactions were observed.
resultsTwenty-six children with CDI and disappearance of hyperintensity in the posterior pituitary were included. They received "Regimen A" Ara-c + dexamethasone + vindesine (n = 7) or "Regimen B" Ara-c + dexamethasone + vindesine + 2-cdA (n = 19) as second-line therapy. There were 14 patients with CDI but without pituitary stalk thickening (PST) and 12 with CDI and PST. In patients with CDI alone, 4/4 patients receiving Regimen A and 3/10 receiving Regimen B improved. All patients with CDI and PST showed improvement for PST. The reappearance of hyperintensity at the posterior pituitary was observed in 10 patients with CDI. All 26 children were alive after a median follow-up of 40.5 months. There were no chemotherapy-related deaths.
conclusionA combined therapy with Ara-c, 2-cdA, dexamethasone, and vindesine could partially alleviate pituitary disease conditions in pediatric LCH with CNS involvement, with good tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.