Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34302558›Full record

ReviewHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

Evaluation of functional outcomes following rectus diastasis repair-an up-to-date literature review.

A Olsson, O Kiwanuka, G Sandblom, O Stackelberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Management of postpartum rectus diastasis in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Simple plication alleviates physical symptoms in patients with post-gestational rectus diastasis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A OlssonDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, and Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institute, Sjukhusbacken 10, 11883, Stockholm, Sweden. anders.olsson@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0003-3852-7476
O KiwanukaDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, and Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institute, Sjukhusbacken 10, 11883, Stockholm, Sweden.
G SandblomDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, and Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institute, Sjukhusbacken 10, 11883, Stockholm, Sweden.
O StackelbergDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, and Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institute, Sjukhusbacken 10, 11883, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver the last decade rectus diastasis has gained attention as a condition that may benefit from surgery. Numerous surgical techniques have been presented but scientifically proper studies reporting functional outcome are few and evidence is incomplete. The aim of this up-to-date review is to analyse the outcomes of rectus diastasis repair in recently published papers, focusing on functional changes following surgery.

methodA comprehensive search in PubMed and Web of Science was performed. Suitable papers were selected using titles and abstracts with terms suggesting surgical treatment of rectus diastasis. All abstracts were scrutinised, and irrelevant studies excluded in four stages. Reports providing original data, including outcome assessment following surgery, were included.

resultTen papers with a total of 780 patients were found to fulfil the search criteria. Study design, surgical procedure, follow-up time, functional outcome and assessment instruments were compiled. All included studies reported improvements in a variety of functional aspects regardless of surgical method. The outcomes assessed include core stability, back pain, abdominal pain, posture, urinary incontinence, abdominal muscle strength and quality of life.

conclusionThe results of this review show that surgical repair of rectus diastasis is a safe and effective treatment that improves functional disability. However, the absence of standardized instruments for assessing outcome makes it impossible to compare studies. Since indications for surgery are relative and related to core function, valid instruments for assessing indication and outcome are needed to ensure benefit of the procedure.

Indexed as

AbdominoplastyQuality of LifeHerniorrhaphyHumansRectus AbdominisTreatment OutcomeAbdominal rectus muscle diastasisAbdominoplastyDiastasis rectiFunctional outcomeQuality of lifeSurgeryUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID34302558
PMCPMC8370918
OpenAlexW3184176088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.