Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34302500›Full record

SynthesisSkeletal radiology2022

Diagnostic performance of MRI and CT in diagnosing necrotizing soft tissue infection: a systematic review.

Robert M Kwee, Thomas C Kwee

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Skeletal radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Discovery of a Thermostable Nigerose Phosphorylase for the Efficient Chemoenzymatic Radiosynthesis of aJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections: a Dutch multicenter cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Complicated and deep bacterial skin and soft tissue infections.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. No role for standard imaging workup of patients with clinically evident necrotizing soft tissue infections: a national retrospective multicenter cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Theoretical Design and Synthesis of Caged Compounds Using X-Ray-Triggered Azo Bond Cleavage.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert M KweeDepartment of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen/Sittard/Geleen, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands. rmkwee@gmail.com.
Thomas C KweeMedical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the accuracy of MRI and CT in diagnosing necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI).

methodsMEDLINE and Embase were searched for original studies which reported the diagnostic performance of MRI or CT in detecting NSTI. Individual study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI and CT were calculated and, if supported by data from at least two studies, pooled using a bivariate random-effects model.

resultsSix MRI studies and 7 CT studies were included. There were no major concerns with regard to study quality and applicability. The included studies used multiple diagnostic criteria, with sensitivities and specificities of both MRI and CT ranging between 0 and 100%. T2 hyperintensity of deep fascia was the most commonly used diagnostic MRI criterion (5 studies), yielding a pooled sensitivity of 86.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.1-92.7%) and a pooled specificity of 65.2% (95% CI 35.4-86.6%). Presence of gas was the most commonly used diagnostic CT criterion (3 studies), yielding a pooled sensitivity of 48.6% (95% CI 37.1-60.2%) and a pooled specificity of 93.2% (95% CI 73.3-98.5%).

conclusionT2 hyperintensity of deep fascia at MRI has high sensitivity and moderate specificity in diagnosing NSTI. Presence of gas at CT has low sensitivity but high specificity. A combination of diagnostic criteria may improve diagnostic performance, but this needs further investigation.

Indexed as

Soft Tissue InfectionsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedDiagnosisFasciitisMagnetic resonance imagingNecrotizingSensitivity and specificitySystematic reviewTomographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.