ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2021
Prenatal perception of breastfeeding recommendations predicts early breastfeeding outcomes of participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).
Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prenatal Breastfeeding Intention Is Consistently Associated with Breastfeeding Duration Among WIC-Participating Women.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Prenatal Perception of WIC Breastfeeding Recommendations Predicts Breastfeeding Exclusivity and Duration in the Infants' First Year.The Journal of nutrition · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrenatal psychosocial factors predict breastfeeding practices but are not assessed in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).
objectivesThis study examined how prenatal perceptions of WIC's breastfeeding recommendations were associated with early breastfeeding outcomes.
methodsThis study used longitudinal data from a national sample of 2053 pregnant participants in the WIC Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study-2 (WIC ITFPS-2) in 2013, the only national data assessing prenatal perceptions of WIC's breastfeeding recommendations. Early breastfeeding outcomes included breastfeeding initiation, breast milk first fed after birth, breastfeeding in the first hour, breast milk first fed after leaving the hospital, and breastfeeding status at the first and third months. The primary predictor was the participant's prenatal perception of whether WIC recommended breastfeeding only or not. Log-binomial regression was used with adjustment for socio-demographics, previous breastfeeding, WIC participation, breastfeeding support, and infant feeding intentions (IFI).
resultsWithout controlling for IFI, the perception of WIC recommending breastfeeding only predicted breastfeeding outcomes positively. The risk ratio (RR) associated with prenatal perceptions varied from 1.14 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.25; P = 0.008) for breastfeeding in the first hour, to 1.27 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.43; P < 0.001) for breast milk first fed after leaving hospital, to 1.66 (95% CI: 1.35, 2.04; P < 0.001) for 3-mo breastfeeding only. After controlling for IFI, the RRs were 1.13 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.24; P = 0.017) for breastfeeding in the first hour, 1.20 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.35; P = 0.004) for breast milk first fed after leaving hospital, and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.84; P < 0.001) for 3-mo breastfeeding only, suggesting that prenatal perception was independently associated with breastfeeding outcomes.
conclusionsPrenatal perception of WIC's breastfeeding recommendations can be regarded as a new psychosocial predictor of breastfeeding and a possible target for future intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.