Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34302253›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2021

Great apes' understanding of biomechanics: eye-tracking experiments using three-dimensional computer-generated animations.

Yutaro Sato, Michiteru Kitazaki, Shoji Itakura, Tomoyo Morita, Yoko Sakuraba, Masaki Tomonaga, Satoshi Hirata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yutaro SatoWildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, 2-24 Tanakasekiden, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068203, Japan. sato.yutaro.76w@st.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0272-9682
Michiteru KitazakiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, 1-1 Hibarigaoka, Tempakucho, Toyohashi, Aichi, 441-8580, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0966-4842
Shoji ItakuraCenter for Baby Science, Doshisha University, 4-1-1 Kizugawadai, Kizugawa, Kyoto, 6190225, Japan.
Tomoyo MoritaInstitute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives, Osaka University, 1-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 5650871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0916-205X
Yoko SakurabaWildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, 2-24 Tanakasekiden, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068203, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2279-1184
Masaki Tomonaga, Inuyama, Aichi, 4840004, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9319-6991
Satoshi HirataWildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, 2-24 Tanakasekiden, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068203, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1026-6270
Kyoto University · JPDoshisha University · JPInuyama Chuo Hospital · JPThe University of Osaka · JPToyohashi University of Technology · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15H05709Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H06283Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18H04194Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18H05524Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19J22889Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 26245069Japan Society for the Promotion of Science LDG-U04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual processing of the body movements of other animals is important for adaptive animal behaviors. It is widely known that animals can distinguish articulated animal movements even when they are just represented by points of light such that only information about biological motion is retained. However, the extent to which nonhuman great apes comprehend the underlying structural and physiological constraints affecting each moving body part, i.e., biomechanics, is still unclear. To address this, we examined the understanding of biomechanics in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), following a previous study on humans (Homo sapiens). Apes underwent eye tracking while viewing three-dimensional computer-generated (CG) animations of biomechanically possible or impossible elbow movements performed by a human, robot, or nonhuman ape. Overall, apes did not differentiate their gaze between possible and impossible movements of elbows. However, some apes looked at elbows for longer when viewing impossible vs. possible robot movements, which indicates that they may have had knowledge of biomechanics and that this knowledge could be extended to a novel agent. These mixed results make it difficult to draw a firm conclusion regarding the extent to which apes understand biomechanics. We discuss some methodological features that may be responsible for the results, as well as implications for future nonhuman animal studies involving the presentation of CG animations or measurement of gaze behaviors.

Indexed as

Eye-Tracking TechnologyHominidaeAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputersPan paniscusPan troglodytesBiomechanicsBody movementBonoboChimpanzeeComputer-generated animation

Identifiers

PMID34302253
OpenAlexW3184179171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.