Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34302217›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2021

Retrospective fractal analyses of one-year follow-up data obtained after single-visit nonsurgical endodontic retreatment on periapical radiographs.

Samet Tosun, Emrah Karataslioglu, Mustafa Mert Tulgar, Gözde Derindag

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Treatment Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Orthograde Retreatment: A Retrospective Study.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samet TosunDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pamukkale University, 20160, Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey. stosun@pau.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3277-197X
Emrah KaratasliogluDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Katip Çelebi University, 35300, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4721-591X
Mustafa Mert TulgarDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Katip Çelebi University, 35300, İzmir, Turkey.
Gözde DerindagDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Pamukkale University, 20160, Denizli, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0147-1798
Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TRPamukkale University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of retrospective study was to evaluate the changes to the periapical bone sites after non-surgical endodontic retreatment by using fractal analysis on periapical radiographs. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty patients whose teeth had periapical lesions and underwent primary endodontic treatment were selected for nonsurgical single-visit endodontic retreatment. Two radiographs were taken, the first immediately after retreatment and the second at the 1-year follow-up. An identical region of interest close to the infected root apex was selected from each radiograph. FD was measured using the box-counting method. Periapical status was evaluated using the periapical index (PAI). Treatment outcomes were categorized into healed (PAI < 3), or not healed (PAI ≥ 3) based on radiographic criteria.

resultsThe mean FD value significantly increased at the 1-year follow-up compared to baseline. No significant sex biases were apparent. According to the PAI, retreatment after 1 year resulted in a 63.3% healed.

conclusionThe extent of periapical trabecular bone evident radiographically increased, as revealed by FD data, 1 year after endodontic retreatment. Clinical relevance The use of fractal analysis as a quantitative method to evaluate changes in periapical trabecular bone (such as healing and inflammation) after endodontic retreatment can be an important marker in determining the prognosis of endodontic retreatment.

Indexed as

FractalsPeriapical PeriodontitisFollow-Up StudiesHumansRetreatmentRetrospective StudiesRoot Canal TherapyDental radiographDiagnostic imagingFractalRetreatmentRetrospective studies

Identifiers

PMID34302217
OpenAlexW3183357156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.