Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34302044›Full record

SynthesisJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2022

A systematic review of the use of silicone wristbands for environmental exposure assessment, with a focus on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Laila Hamzai, Nicolas Lopez Galvez, Eunha Hoh, Nathan G Dodder, Georg E Matt, Penelope J Quintana

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Characterizing variability in personal chemical exposure to improve exposomics.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Silicone Wristbands for Measuring Human Exposure to Organic Chemicals: Uses and Benefits for Human Biological Research.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing Nicotine Exposure in Users and Non-Users of Electronic Cigarettes Through Silicone Wristbands.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Water, Soil, Noise, and Light Pollution: JACC Focus Seminar, Part 2.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pets, Genuine Tools of Environmental Pollutant Detection.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laila HamzaiSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Nicolas Lopez GalvezSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Eunha HohSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Nathan G DodderSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Georg E MattDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Penelope J QuintanaSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA. jquintan@sdsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure assessment is critical for connecting environmental pollutants to health outcomes and evaluating impacts of interventions or environmental policies. Silicone wristbands (SWBs) show promise for multi-pollutant exposure assessment, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), a ubiquitous class of toxic environmental pollutants.

objectiveTo review published studies where SWBs were worn on the wrist for human environmental exposure assessments and evaluate the ability of SWBs to capture personal exposures, identify gaps which need to be addressed to implement this tool, and make recommendations for future studies to advance the field of exposure science through utilization of SWBs.

methodsWe performed a systematic search and a cited reference search in Scopus and extracted key study descriptions.

resultsThirty-nine unique studies were identified, with analytes including PAHs, pesticides, flame retardants, and tobacco products. SWBs were shipped under ambient conditions without apparent analyte loss, indicating utility for global exposure and health studies. Nineteen articles detected a total of 60 PAHs in at least one SWB. Correlations with other concurrent biological and air measurements indicate the SWB captures exposure to flame retardants, tobacco products, and PAHs. SIGNIFICANCE: SWBs show promise as a simple-to-deploy tool to estimate environmental and occupational exposures to chemical mixtures, including PAHs.

Indexed as

Flame RetardantsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringHumansSiliconesFlame RetardantsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsSiliconesPersonal exposurePolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.