Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301979›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Validation of a self-report questionnaire for periodontitis in a Japanese population.

Masanori Iwasaki, Michihiko Usui, Wataru Ariyoshi, Keisuke Nakashima, Yoshie Nagai-Yoshioka, Maki Inoue, Kaoru Kobayashi, Wenche S Borgnakke, George W Taylor, Tatsuji Nishihara

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Masanori IwasakiTokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan. iwasaki@tmig.or.jp.
Michihiko UsuiDivision of Periodontology, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Wataru AriyoshiDivision of Infections and Molecular Biology, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Keisuke NakashimaDivision of Periodontology, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Yoshie Nagai-YoshiokaDivision of Infections and Molecular Biology, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Maki InoueDental Center for Regional Medical Survey, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Kaoru KobayashiGraduate School of Dentistry, MSc Program, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Wenche S BorgnakkeDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
George W TaylorDivision of Oral Epidemiology and Dental Public Health, Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, UCSF School of Dentistry, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Tatsuji NishiharaDental Center for Regional Medical Survey, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to assess the validity of the self-report questionnaire for periodontitis in a Japanese population. A Japanese 9-item self-report questionnaire, developed by translating English-version questions that were used to detect periodontitis, was validated against full-mouth clinically-assessed periodontitis in 949 Japanese adults (average age = 43.2 years). Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), wherein the periodontitis case definition of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology was considered the gold standard. Severe, moderate, and mild periodontitis were identified in 6.2%, 30.0%, and 6.7% of the study population, respectively. Self-reported oral health questions combined with socio-demographic and health-related variables had an AUC > 0.70 (range, 0.71-0.87) for any periodontitis category. Four oral health questions ("have gum disease," "loose tooth," "lost bone," and "bleeding gums") were selected in the parsimonious model for severe periodontitis. The periodontitis screening score generated by the responses to these four questions had an AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.82, 73.1%, and 74.3%, respectively, where the cut-off was set at 2 points. In conclusion, a locally adapted version of the self-report questionnaire had an acceptable diagnostic capacity for the detection of periodontitis in this study population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAsian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOral HealthPeriodontitisPrevalenceROC CurveSelf ReportSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34301979
PMCPMC8302714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.