Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301936›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Quantitative imaging of transcription in living Drosophila embryos reveals the impact of core promoter motifs on promoter state dynamics.

Virginia L Pimmett, Matthieu Dejean, Carola Fernandez, Antonio Trullo, Edouard Bertrand, Ovidiu Radulescu, Mounia Lagha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Invariant nonequilibrium dynamics in gene regulation optimize information flow.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What makes genes burst.Trends in cell biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Regulation of Transcriptional Bursting and Spatial Patterning in EarlybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Virginia L Pimmett *Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5786-7989
Matthieu Dejean *Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4175-1954
Carola FernandezInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Antonio TrulloInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7560-3859
Edouard BertrandInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9642-7994
Ovidiu RadulescuLaboratory of Pathogen Host Interactions, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6453-5707
Mounia LaghaInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France. mounia.lagha@igmm.cnrs.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7082-1950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes are expressed in stochastic transcriptional bursts linked to alternating active and inactive promoter states. A major challenge in transcription is understanding how promoter composition dictates bursting, particularly in multicellular organisms. We investigate two key Drosophila developmental promoter motifs, the TATA box (TATA) and the Initiator (INR). Using live imaging in Drosophila embryos and new computational methods, we demonstrate that bursting occurs on multiple timescales ranging from seconds to minutes. TATA-containing promoters and INR-containing promoters exhibit distinct dynamics, with one or two separate rate-limiting steps respectively. A TATA box is associated with long active states, high rates of polymerase initiation, and short-lived, infrequent inactive states. In contrast, the INR motif leads to two inactive states, one of which relates to promoter-proximal polymerase pausing. Surprisingly, the model suggests pausing is not obligatory, but occurs stochastically for a subset of polymerases. Overall, our results provide a rationale for promoter switching during zygotic genome activation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophila melanogasterEmbryo, NonmammalianGreen Fluorescent ProteinsKineticsLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, TheoreticalPromoter Regions, GeneticRed Fluorescent ProteinTATA BoxTime-Lapse ImagingTranscription, GeneticGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsRed Fluorescent Protein

Identifiers

PMID34301936
PMCPMC8302612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.