Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301929›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

KRAP tethers IP

Nagendra Babu Thillaiappan, Holly A Smith, Peace Atakpa-Adaji, Colin W Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pacemaking in the lymphatic system.The Journal of physiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From IP3RPEP6 Inhibition of IPCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Inter-membrane control of junctional InsPTrends in cell biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Dissociation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate from IPThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors in cardiomyocyte physiology and disease.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nagendra Babu ThillaiappanDepartment of Pharmacology, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, UK. nagendrababu@qu.edu.qa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5641-4067
Holly A SmithDepartment of Pharmacology, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, UK.
Peace Atakpa-AdajiDepartment of Pharmacology, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, UK.
Colin W TaylorDepartment of Pharmacology, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, UK. cwt1000@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7771-1044
Lawn Tennis Association · GBBridge University · SSDigital Catapult · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T012986/1Wellcome Trust 101844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulation of IP

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsCalciumCytosolHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHumansInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsMembrane ProteinsMicrofilament ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceProtein BindingRNA InterferenceActinsCalciumInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsITPRID2 protein, humanMembrane ProteinsMicrofilament Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34301929
PMCPMC8302619
OpenAlexW3184228824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.