Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301829›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Dissociating the Neural Correlates of Consciousness and Task Relevance in Face Perception Using Simultaneous EEG-fMRI.

Torge Dellert, Miriam Müller-Bardorff, Insa Schlossmacher, Michael Pitts, David Hofmann, Maximilian Bruchmann, Thomas Straube

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. A two-system theory of sensory-evoked brain responses.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nonconscious processing of fearful and neutral faces modulates the N170.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Torge DellertInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany torge.dellert@uni-muenster.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-7474
Miriam Müller-BardorffInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Insa SchlossmacherInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-5352
Michael PittsDepartment of Psychology, Reed College, Portland, Oregon 97202.
David HofmannInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Maximilian BruchmannInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8897-1252
Thomas StraubeInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current theories of visual consciousness disagree about whether it emerges during early stages of processing in sensory brain regions or later when a widespread frontoparietal network becomes involved. Moreover, disentangling conscious perception from task-related postperceptual processes (e.g., report) and integrating results across different neuroscientific methods remain ongoing challenges. The present study addressed these problems using simultaneous EEG-fMRI and a specific inattentional blindness paradigm with three physically identical phases in female and male human participants. In phase 1, participants performed a distractor task during which line drawings of faces and control stimuli were presented centrally. While some participants spontaneously noticed the faces in phase 1, others remained inattentionally blind. In phase 2, all participants were made aware of the task-irrelevant faces but continued the distractor task. In phase 3, the faces became task-relevant. Bayesian analysis of brain responses demonstrated that conscious face perception was most strongly associated with activation in fusiform gyrus (fMRI) as well as the N170 and visual awareness negativity (EEG). Smaller awareness effects were revealed in the occipital and prefrontal cortex (fMRI). Task-relevant face processing, on the other hand, led to strong, extensive activation of occipitotemporal, frontoparietal, and attentional networks (fMRI). In EEG, it enhanced early negativities and elicited a pronounced P3b component. Overall, we provide evidence that conscious visual perception is linked with early processing in stimulus-specific sensory brain areas but may additionally involve prefrontal cortex. In contrast, the strong activation of widespread brain networks and the P3b are more likely associated with task-related processes.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionBrainConsciousnessElectroencephalographyFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleVisual PerceptionYoung AdultattentionawarenessconsciousnessEEGfMRIvision

Identifiers

PMID34301829
PMCPMC8445054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.