Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301813›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Neutrophils in the era of immune checkpoint blockade.

Julien Faget, Solange Peters, Xavier Quantin, Etienne Meylan, Nathalie Bonnefoy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Early Detriment Analysis of First-Line Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab-Based Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julien FagetIRCM, Inserm, Univ Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France julien.faget@inserm.fr nathalie.bonnefoy@inserm.fr.
Solange PetersDepartment of Oncology CHUV-UNIL, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Xavier QuantinService d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, 34298, Montpellier, France.
Etienne MeylanSwiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nathalie BonnefoyIRCM, Inserm, Univ Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France julien.faget@inserm.fr nathalie.bonnefoy@inserm.fr.
Inserm · FRInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRSwiss Cancer Center Léman · CHUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immune checkpoint blockade-based immunotherapies are revolutionizing cancer management. Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) were recently highlighted to have a pivotal role in modulating the tumor microenvironment and the antitumor immune response. However, these cells were largely ignored during the development of therapies based on programmed cell death receptor or ligand-1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Latest evidences of neutrophil functional diversity in tumor raised many questions and suggest that targeting these cells can offer new treatment opportunities in the context of ICI development. Here, we summarized key information on TAN origin, function, and plasticity that should be considered when developing ICIs and provide a detailed review of the ongoing clinical trials that combine ICIs and a second compound that might affect or be affected by TANs. This review article synthetizes important notions from the literature demonstrating that: (1) Cancer development associates with a profound alteration of neutrophil biogenesis and function that can predict and interfere with the response to ICIs, (2) Neutrophil infiltration in tumor is associated with key features of resistance to ICIs, and (3) TANs play an important role in resistance to antiangiogenic drugs reducing their clinical benefit when used in combination with ICIs. Finally, exploring the clinical/translational aspects of neutrophil impact on the response to ICIs offers the opportunity to propose new translational research avenues to better understand TAN biology and treat patients.

Indexed as

HumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeutrophilsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsactiveimmunotherapymyeloid-derived suppressor cellsneutrophil infiltrationprogrammed cell death 1 receptortumor escape

Identifiers

PMID34301813
PMCPMC8728357
OpenAlexW3185036246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.