Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301678›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2021

Development of a prediction model for foot ulcer recurrence in people with diabetes using easy-to-obtain clinical variables.

Wouter B Aan de Stegge, Martijn C Schut, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Jeff G van Baal, Jaap J van Netten, Sicco A Bus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Commentary on "Analysis of Factors Influencing the Recurrence of Diabetic Foot Ulcers".Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wouter B Aan de SteggeAmsterdam UMC, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4834-1691
Martijn C SchutAmsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Informatics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ameen Abu-HannaAmsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Informatics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeff G van BaalHospital Group Twente, Department of Surgery, Almelo, The Netherlands.
Jaap J van NettenAmsterdam UMC, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6420-6046
Sicco A BusAmsterdam UMC, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands s.a.bus@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8357-9163
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe aimed to develop a prediction model for foot ulcer recurrence in people with diabetes using easy-to-obtain clinical variables and to validate its predictive performance in order to help risk assessment in this high-risk group. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe used data from a prospective analysis of 304 people with foot ulcer history who had 18-month follow-up for ulcer outcome. Demographic, disease-related and organization-of-care variables were included as potential predictors. Two logistic regression prediction models were created: model 1 for all recurrent foot ulcers (n=126 events) and model 2 for recurrent plantar foot ulcers (n=70 events). We used 10-fold cross-validation, each including five multiple imputation sets for internal validation. Performance was assessed in terms of discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0-1, 1=perfect discrimination), and calibration with the Brier Score (0-1, 0=complete concordance predicted vs observed values) and calibration graphs.

resultsPredictors in model 1 were: a younger age, more severe peripheral sensory neuropathy, fewer months since healing of previous ulcer, presence of a minor lesion, use of a walking aid and not monitoring foot temperatures at home. Mean AUC for model 1 was 0.69 (2SD 0.040) and mean Brier Score was 0.22 (2SD 0.011). Predictors in model 2 were: a younger age, plantar location of previous ulcer, fewer months since healing of previous ulcer, presence of a minor lesion, consumption of alcohol, use of a walking aid, and foot care received in a university medical center. Mean AUC for model 2 was 0.66 (2SD 0.023) and mean Brier Score was 0.16 (2SD 0.0048).

conclusionsThese internally validated prediction models predict with reasonable to good calibration and fair discrimination who is at highest risk of ulcer recurrence. The people at highest risk should be monitored more carefully and treated more intensively than others. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5403.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootNeoplasmsHumansProspective StudiesROC CurveWound Healingdiabetic footfoot ulcermodelsstatistical

Identifiers

PMID34301678
PMCPMC8311312
OpenAlexW3186766967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.