Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301660›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Development of a primary care pandemic plan informed by in-depth policy analysis and interviews with family physicians across Canada during COVID-19: a qualitative case study protocol.

Maria Mathews, Sarah Spencer, Lindsay Hedden, Emily Gard Marshall, Julia Lukewich, Leslie Meredith, Dana Ryan, Richard Buote, Tiffany Liu, Emily Volpe and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pandemic preparedness lessons for family physicians and other primary care providers.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Strengthening the integration of primary care in pandemic response plans: a qualitative interview study of Canadian family physicians.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Maria MathewsDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada maria.mathews@schulich.uwo.ca.
Sarah SpencerFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7034-6387
Lindsay HeddenFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Emily Gard MarshallDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8327-0329
Julia LukewichFaculty of Nursing, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Leslie MeredithDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Dana RyanFaculty of Nursing, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Richard BuoteFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Tiffany LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Emily VolpeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Paul S GillUniversity of Toronto, Goderich, Ontario, Canada.
Bridget RyanDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Gordon SchacterDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jamie WickettDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Thomas R FreemanDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Shannon L SibbaldDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Eric WongDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Maddi McKayDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Rita McCrackenDepartment of Family Medicine, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2962-0364
Judith Belle BrownDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Western University · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CADalhousie University · CASimon Fraser University · CAProvidence Health Care · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGiven the recurrent risk of respiratory illness-based pandemics, and the important roles family physicians play during public health emergencies, the development of pandemic plans for primary care is imperative. Existing pandemic plans in Canada, however, do not adequately incorporate family physicians' roles and perspectives. This policy and planning oversight has become increasingly evident with the emergence of the novel coronavirus disease, COVID-19, pandemic. This study is designed to inform the development of pandemic plans for primary care through evidence from four provinces in Canada: British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, and Ontario. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will employ a multiple-case study of regions in four provinces. Each case consists of a mixed methods design which comprises: (1) a chronology of family physician roles in the COVID-19 pandemic response; (2) a provincial policy analysis; and (3) qualitative interviews with family physicians. Relevant policy and guidance documents will be identified through targeted, snowball and general search strategies. Additionally, these policy documents will be analysed to identify gaps and/or emphases in existing policies and policy responses. Interviews will explore family physicians' proposed, actual and potential roles during the pandemic, the facilitators and barriers they have encountered throughout and the influence of gender on their professional roles. Data will be thematically analysed using a content analysis framework, first at the regional level and then through cross-case analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval for this study has been granted by the Research Ethics of British Columbia, the Health Research Ethics Board of Newfoundland and Labrador, the Nova Scotia Health Authority Research Ethics Board and the Western University Research Ethics Board. Findings will be disseminated via conferences and peer-reviewed publications. Evidence and lessons learnt will be used to develop tools for government ministries, public health units and family physicians for improved pandemic response plans for primary care.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsBritish ColumbiaHumansNewfoundland and LabradorNova ScotiaOntarioPhysicians, FamilyPolicy MakingPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2COVID-19primary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID34301660
PMCPMC8300554
OpenAlexW3184460659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.