SynthesisBMJ open2021
Indicators of response to exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-guided integration of aging-related functional assessment to predict nonresponse to cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Article
- A machine learning approach predicts improvement of physical exercise capacity based on pulse wave analysis in coronary artery disease patients.Journal of sport and health science · 2026Article
- Exploring the Hidden Complexity: Entropy Analysis in Pulse Oximetry of Female Athletes.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Building Bridges Instead of Putting Up Walls: Connecting the "Teams" to Improve Soccer Players' Support.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- A Perspective on High-Intensity Interval Training for Performance and Health.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeans-based analysis of maximal rate of oxygen consumption (VO
objectivesWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate exercise response rates in the context of VO
methodsThree databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL) and additional sources were searched. Both individual response rate and population average data were incorporated through continuous data, respectively. Of 3268 identified manuscripts, a total of 29 studies were suitable for qualitative synthesis and a further 22 for quantitative. Stratification based on intervention duration (less than 12 weeks; more than or equal to 12 weeks) was undertaken.
resultsA total of 62 data points were procured. Both END and HIIT training exhibited differential improvements in VO
conclusionsThe potential for LT and HR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.