Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301613›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of ophthalmology2022

Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in Japanese participants of HAWK.

Yuichiro Ogura, Glenn J Jaffe, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung, Gregg T Kokame, Tomohiro Iida, Kanji Takahashi, Won Ki Lee, Andrew A Chang, Jordi Monés, Divya D'Souza and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The spectrum of pachychoroid neovasculopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Pachychoroid disease: review and update.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Yuichiro OguraGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan ogura@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0430-5330
Glenn J JaffeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Chui Ming Gemmy CheungSingHealth Duke NUS Academic Medical Center, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3358-3516
Gregg T KokameUniversity of Hawaii School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7487-2205
Tomohiro IidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kanji TakahashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi, Japan.
Won Ki LeeNune Eye Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Andrew A ChangSydney Retina Clinic, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7555-1585
Jordi MonésInstitut de la Màcula, Barcelona, Spain.
Divya D'SouzaNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Georges WeissgerberNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Kinfemichael GedifNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Adrian KohEye and Retina Surgeons, Camden Medical Centre, Singapore.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHBarcelona Macula Foundation · ESDuke University · USEye & Retina Surgeons · SGKansai Medical University · JPNagoya City University · JPNune Eye Hospital · KRSingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre · SGThe University of Sydney · AUTokyo Women's Medical University · JPUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) over 96 weeks in the HAWK study.

designHAWK was a global, 2-year, randomised, double-masked, multicentre phase III trial in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

methodsOf the Japanese participants with PCV, 39 received brolucizumab 6 mg and 30 received aflibercept 2 mg. After 3 monthly loading doses, brolucizumab-treated eyes received an injection every 12 weeks (q12w) but were adjusted to q8w if disease activity was detected. Aflibercept-treated eyes received fixed q8w dosing. Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the proportion of participants on q12w, retinal thickness, retinal fluid changes and safety were assessed to Week 96.

resultsMean change in BCVA (early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) letters) from baseline to week 48/week 96 was+10.4/+11.4 for brolucizumab and +11.6/+11.1 for aflibercept. For brolucizumab-treated eyes, the probability of only q12w dosing after loading through week 48 was 76%, and 68% through week 96. Fluid resolution was greater with brolucizumab than aflibercept: respective proportions of eyes with intraretinal fluid and/or subretinal fluid were 7.7% and 30% at week 48% and 12.8% and 16.7% at week 96. Brolucizumab exhibited an overall well-tolerated safety profile despite a higher rate of intraocular inflammation compared with aflibercept.

conclusionIn Japanese eyes with PCV, brolucizumab q12w/q8w monotherapy resulted in robust and consistent BCVA gains that were comparable to q8w aflibercept dosing. Anatomical outcomes favoured brolucizumab over aflibercept, with 76% of brolucizumab participants maintained on q12w dosing after loading to week 48.

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesHawksAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansIntravitreal InjectionsJapanReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbrolucizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion Proteinsclinical trialretina

Identifiers

PMID34301613
PMCPMC9234403
OpenAlexW3185440938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.