ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2022
Moving Towards FAIR Data Practices in Pharmacy Education.
Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of Evidence-Based Pharmacy on the quality of pharmaceutical care: A survey study.PloS one · 2025Article
- FAIR data management: a framework for fostering data literacy in biomedical sciences education.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- The Journey to a FAIR CORE DATA SET for Diabetes Research in Germany.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacy schools are generating significant amounts of data across the training continuum, including data about student selection, performance, and job placement. However, current data practices limit the Academy's ability to effectively leverage the vast amounts of data available within and across pharmacy institutions. To improve data practices and promote the quality and reusability of data, a set of guiding principles for data management and stewardship were developed and published in 2016. The FAIR principles state that digital objects should be findable (ie, data have a unique identifier and are registered in a searchable resource), accessible (ie, data are retrievable by their identifier using an open, free, standardized protocol), interoperable (ie, data use a formal, accessible, shared, and broadly applicable language, and include qualified references to other data), and reusable (ie, data are described with accurate and relevant attributes, released with a data usage license, and meet domain-relevant community standards). This commentary advocates for improved data practices and provides recommendations for advancing FAIR data principles in pharmacy education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.