Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301300›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2021

Feasibility of Conebeam CT-based online adaptive radiotherapy for neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer.

Rianne de Jong, Jorrit Visser, Niek van Wieringen, Jan Wiersma, Debby Geijsen, Arjan Bel

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05682950 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Study to Evaluate Optimal Margin of Iterative Cone-beam Computed Tomography Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy for Postoperative Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled15ConditionsUterine Cervical Neoplasm, Endometrial NeoplasmsArmsonline adaptive radiotherapy
NCT05869123 phase1 / phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Study to Evaluate Online Adaptive Radiotherapy in Postoperative Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical With Reduced Margin

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2022 to 2026Enrolled17ConditionsUterine Cervical Neoplasm, Endometrial NeoplasmsArmsOnline adaptive radiotherapy
NCT05880485 phase1 / phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Study to Evaluate Online Adaptive Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer With Reduced Margin

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmArmsonline adaptive radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Innovative radiotherapy approaches.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rianne de JongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.a.j.dejong@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3833-3479
Jorrit VisserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niek van WieringenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan WiersmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Debby GeijsenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjan BelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnline adaptive radiotherapy has the potential to reduce toxicity for patients treated for rectal cancer because smaller planning target volumes (PTV) margins around the entire clinical target volume (CTV) are required. The aim of this study is to describe the first clinical experience of a Conebeam CT (CBCT)-based online adaptive workflow for rectal cancer, evaluating timing of different steps in the workflow, plan quality, target coverage and patient compliance.

methodsTwelve consecutive patients eligible for 5 × 5 Gy pre-operative radiotherapy were treated on a ring-based linear accelerator with a multidisciplinary team present at the treatment machine for each fraction. The accelerator is operated using an integrated software platform for both treatment planning and delivery. In all directions for all CTVs a PTV margin of 5 mm was used, except for the cranial/caudal borders of the total CTV where a margin of 8 mm was applied. A reference plan was generated based on a single planning CT. After aligning the patient the online adaptive procedure started with acquisition of a CBCT. The planning CT scan was registered to the CBCT using deformable registration and a synthetic CT scan was generated. With the support of artificial intelligence, structure guided deformation and the synthetic CT scan contours were adapted by the system to match the anatomy on the CBCT. If necessary, these contours were adjusted before a new plan was generated. A second and third CBCT were acquired to validate the new plan with respect to CTV coverage just before and after treatment delivery, respectively. Treatment was delivered using volumetric modulated arc treatment (VMAT). All steps in this process were defined and timed.

resultsOn average the timeslot needed at the treatment machine was 34 min. The process of acquiring a CBCT, evaluating and adjusting the contours, creating the new plan and verifying the CTV on the CBCT scan took on average 20 min. Including delivery and post treatment verification this was 26 min. Manual adjustments of the target volumes were necessary in 50% of fractions. Plan quality, target coverage and patient compliance were excellent.

conclusionsFirst clinical experience with CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy shows it is feasible for rectal cancer. Trial registration Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study and was retrospectively approved by the Medical Ethics review Committee of the Academic Medical Center (W21_087 # 21.097; Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overArtificial IntelligenceCone-Beam Computed TomographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskPrognosisRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAdaptive radiotherapyAdaptive treatmentConebeam CTRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34301300
PMCPMC8305875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.