Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301281›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

Challenges in the PREHOSPITAL emergency management of geriatric trauma patients - a scoping review.

Michael Eichinger, Henry Douglas Pow Robb, Cosmo Scurr, Harriet Tucker, Stefan Heschl, George Peck

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chinese expert consensus on the prehospital management of major trauma.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Trauma-related mortality in a European region with an intermediately mature trauma system: a comprehensive population-based analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cognitive biases in clinical decision-making in prehospital critical care; a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Pain assessment and management of adult patients in the Swedish EMS: a nationwide registry study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Observational
  13. Inter-facility transfers to an urban level 1 trauma center and rates of secondary overtriage.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael EichingerMajor Trauma and Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. Michael.eichinger@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8510-1123
Henry Douglas Pow RobbAcademic Clinical Fellow in General Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Cosmo ScurrDepartment of Anaesthesia, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Harriet TuckerEmergency Department St George's Hospital, London, UK.
Stefan HeschlDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University Hospital, Graz, Austria.
George PeckCutrale Peri-operative and Ageing Group, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBGraz University Hospital · ATImperial College London · GBSt George's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a widely acknowledged increase in older people presenting with traumatic injury in western populations there remains a lack of research into the optimal prehospital management of this vulnerable patient group. Research into this cohort faces many uniqu1e challenges, such as inconsistent definitions, variable physiology, non-linear presentation and multi-morbidity. This scoping review sought to summarise the main challenges in providing prehospital care to older trauma patients to improve the care for this vulnerable group. METHODS AND

findingsA scoping review was performed searching Google Scholar, PubMed and Medline from 2000 until 2020 for literature in English addressing the management of older trauma patients in both the prehospital arena and Emergency Department. A thematic analysis and narrative synthesis was conducted on the included 131 studies. Age-threshold was confirmed by a descriptive analysis from all included studies. The majority of the studies assessed triage and found that recognition and undertriage presented a significant challenge, with adverse effects on mortality. We identified six key challenges in the prehospital field that were summarised in this review.

conclusionsTrauma in older people is common and challenges prehospital care providers in numerous ways that are difficult to address. Undertriage and the potential for age bias remain prevalent. In this Scoping Review, we identified and discussed six major challenges that are unique to the prehospital environment. More high-quality evidence is needed to investigate this issue further.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesWounds and InjuriesAgedBiasHumansTrauma CentersTriageGeriatric traumaPrehospital careTraumaTraumatic injuriesTriage

Identifiers

PMID34301281
PMCPMC8305876
OpenAlexW3185596114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.