Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301254›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2021

A cost-consequence analysis of normalised advance care planning practices among people with chronic diseases in hospital and community settings.

Sarah Jeong, Se Ok Ohr, Peter Cleasby, Tomiko Barrett, Ryan Davey, Simon Deeming

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah JeongSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, 10 Chittaway Road, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia. Sarah.Jeong@newcastle.edu.au.
Se Ok OhrSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, 10 Chittaway Road, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia.
Peter CleasbyDivision of Aged, Subacute and Complex Care, PO Box 6088 Long Jetty, Central Coast Local Health District, NSW, 2261, Gosford, Australia.
Tomiko BarrettDepartment of Aged Care Services, Wyong Hospital, PO Box 4200, Lakehaven, Central Coast Local Health District, Wyong, NSW, 2263, Australia.
Ryan DaveySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, 10 Chittaway Road, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia.
Simon DeemingHunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia.
Central Coast Local Health District · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AUHunter New England Local Health District · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing body of international literature concurs that comprehensive and complex Advance Care Planning (ACP) programs involving specially qualified or trained healthcare professionals are effective in increasing documentation of Advance Care Directives (ACDs), improving compliance with patients' wishes and satisfaction with care, and quality of care for patients and their families. Economic analyses of ACDs and ACP have been more sporadic and inconclusive. This study aimed to contribute to the evidence on resource use associated with implementation of ACP and to inform key decision-makers of the resource implications through the conduct of a cost-consequence analysis of the Normalised Advance Care Planning (NACP) trial.

methodsThe outcomes for the economic evaluation included the number of completed "legally binding" ACDs and the number of completed Conversation Cards (CC). The cost analysis assessed the incremental difference in resource utilisation between Usual Practice and the Intervention. Costs have been categorised into: 1) Contract staff costs; 2) Costs associated with the development of the intervention; 3) Implementation costs; 4) Intervention (delivery) costs; and 5) Research costs.

resultsThe cost incurred for each completed ACD was A$13,980 in the hospital setting and A$1248 in the community setting. The cost incurred for each completed Conversation Card was A$7528 in the hospital setting and A$910 in the community setting.

conclusionsThe cost-consequence analysis does not support generalisation of the specified intervention within the hospital setting. The trial realised an estimated incremental cost per completed ACD of $1248, within the community setting. This estimate provides an additional benchmark against which decision-makers can assess the value of either 1) this approach towards the realisation of additional completed ACDs; and/or 2) the value of ACP and ACDs more broadly, when this estimate is positioned within the potential health outcomes and downstream health service implications that may arise for people with or without a completed ACD.

trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12618001627246 ). The URL of the trial registry record.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAustraliaChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisHospitalsHumansAdvance care directiveAdvance care planningChronic diseaseClinical trialCommunityCost-consequence analysisHospitalNurses

Identifiers

PMID34301254
PMCPMC8305493
OpenAlexW3186444399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.