Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34301202›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2021

Validity and reliability of the medial temporal lobe atrophy scale in a memory clinic population.

Anna Molinder, Doerthe Ziegelitz, Stephan E Maier, Carl Eckerström

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna MolinderDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. anna.molinder@vgregion.se.
Doerthe ZiegelitzDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Stephan E MaierDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Carl EckerströmDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SERegion Västra Götaland · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual rating of medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) is often performed in conjunction with dementia workup. Most prior studies involved patients with known or probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study investigated the validity and reliability of MTA in a memory clinic population.

methodsMTA was rated in 752 MRI examinations, of which 105 were performed in cognitively healthy participants (CH), 184 in participants with subjective cognitive impairment, 249 in subjects with mild cognitive impairment, and 214 in patients with dementia, including AD, subcortical vascular dementia and mixed dementia. Hippocampal volumes, measured manually or using FreeSurfer, were available in the majority of cases. Intra- and interrater reliability was tested using Cohen's weighted kappa. Correlation between MTA and quantitative hippocampal measurements was ascertained with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Moreover, diagnostic ability of MTA was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and suitable, age-dependent MTA thresholds were determined.

resultsRater agreement was moderate to substantial. MTA correlation with quantitative volumetric methods ranged from -0.20 (p< 0.05) to -0.68 (p < 0.001) depending on the quantitative method used. Both MTA and FreeSurfer are able to distinguish dementia subgroups from CH. Suggested age-dependent MTA thresholds are 1 for the age group below 75 years and 1.5 for the age group 75 years and older.

conclusionsMTA can be considered a valid marker of medial temporal lobe atrophy and may thus be valuable in the assessment of patients with cognitive impairment, even in a heterogeneous patient population.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionTemporal LobeAtrophyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsAlzheimer’s diseaseAtrophyDementiaMagnetic resonance imagingMedial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA)Mild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID34301202
PMCPMC8305846
OpenAlexW3183710235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.