ArticlePolymers2021
A Phenomenological Primary-Secondary-Tertiary Creep Model for Polymer-Bonded Composite Materials.
Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation Between Microscale Indentation Creep and Macroscale Tensile Creep of PLA/PCL Polymer Blends.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Coarse-Grained Modeling and Interpretation of Phenomenological Creep Rate Behavior with Experimental Validation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- An Exploratory Study on Determining and Modeling the Creep Behavior of an Acrylic Pressure-Sensitive Adhesive.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Correlations between Microscale Indentation Creep and Macroscale Tensile Creep of Polymers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Modelling of Environmental Ageing of Polymers and Polymer Composites-Durability Prediction Methods.Polymers · 2022Review
- An Engineering Prediction Model for Stress Relaxation of Polymer Composites at Multiple Temperatures.Polymers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study develops a unified phenomenological creep model for polymer-bonded composite materials, allowing for predicting the creep behavior in the three creep stages, namely the primary, the secondary, and the tertiary stages under sustained compressive stresses. Creep testing is performed using material specimens under several conditions with a temperature range of 20 °C-50 °C and a compressive stress range of 15 MPa-25 MPa. The testing data reveal that the strain rate-time response exhibits the transient, steady, and unstable stages under each of the testing conditions. A rational function-based creep rate equation is proposed to describe the full creep behavior under each of the testing conditions. By further correlating the resulting model parameters with temperature and stress and developing a Larson-Miller parameter-based rupture time prediction model, a unified phenomenological model is established. An independent validation dataset and third-party testing data are used to verify the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed model. The performance of the proposed model is compared with that of an existing reference model. The verification and comparison results show that the model can describe all the three stages of the creep process, and the proposed model outperforms the reference model by yielding 28.5% smaller root mean squared errors on average.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.