ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Research into the Disintegration of Abrasive Materials in the Abrasive Water Jet Machining Process.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Adaptive Control of Pressure Difference in Abrasive Flow Machining for Inner Hole with High Depth/Diameter Ratio.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enhancing High-Alloy Steel Cutting with Abrasive Water Injection Jet (AWIJ) Technology: An Approach Using the Response Surface Methodology (RSM).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- A Statistical and Optimization Study on the Influence of Different Abrasive Types on Kerf Quality and Productivity during Abrasive Waterjet (AWJ) Milling of Ti-4Al-6V.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Research Progress in Abrasive Water Jet Processing Technology.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Application of RSM Method for Optimization of Geraniol Transformation Process in the Presence of Garnet.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Possibilities of Rock Processing with a High-Pressure Abrasive Waterjet with an Aspect Terms to Minimizing Energy Consumption.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Temperature Measurement during Abrasive Water Jet Machining (AWJM).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Efficiency of Tool Steel Cutting by Water Jet with Recycled Abrasive Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Use of a High-Pressure Water-Ice Jet for Removing Worn Paint Coating in Renovation Process.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Reduction of Cracks in Marble Appeared at Hydro-Abrasive Jet Cutting Using Taguchi Method.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Influence of Local Temperature Changes on the Material Microstructure in Abrasive Water Jet Machining (AWJM).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The size and distribution of abrasive particles have a significant influence on the effectiveness of the cutting process by the high-speed abrasive water jet (AWJ). This paper deals with the disintegration intensity of abrasive materials in AWJ cutting during the creation of the abrasive jet. An evaluation of the abrasive materials was performed after forming in the cutting head was carried out and grain distribution was evaluated using the geometric and logarithmic Folk and Ward method. The influence of the abrasive concentration of abrasive materials such as alluvial garnet, recycled garnet, corundum, and olivine on grain distribution was studied. A recovery analysis was also carried out and the recycling coefficient was determined for each abrasive material tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.