ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Bone Conduction Capacity of Highly Porous 3D-Printed Titanium Scaffolds Based on Different Pore Designs.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifunctional 3D-Printed Titanium Alloy Composite-Coated Scaffold for Modulating the Immune Microenvironment and Promoting Osteogenesis.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- 3D-ink-extruded titanium scaffolds with porous struts and bioactive supramolecular polymers for orthopedic implants.Acta biomaterialia · 2024Article
- Designing and additive manufacturing of talus implant for post-traumatic talus avascular necrosis: a case study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Evolution from Bioinert to Bioresorbable: In Vivo Comparative Study of Additively Manufactured Metal Bone Scaffolds.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- 3D printing metal implants in orthopedic surgery: Methods, applications and future prospects.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2023Review
- Comparative Analysis of Bone Ingrowth in 3D-Printed Titanium Lattice Structures with Different Patterns.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Emerging Materials for Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- 3D-Printing for Critical Sized Bone Defects: Current Concepts and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Evolution, Current Indications and Outcomes of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- A Review of 3D Printed Bone Implants.Micromachines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In porous titanium scaffolds manufactured via 3D printing, the differences in bone formation according to pore design and implantation period were studied. Titanium scaffolds with three types of different pore structures (Octadense, Gyroid, and Dode) were fabricated via 3D printing using the selective laser melting method. Mechanical properties of scaffolds were investigated. Prepared specimens were inserted into both femurs of nine rabbits and their clinical characteristics were observed. Three animals were sacrificed at the 2nd, 4th, and 6th weeks, and the differences in bone formation were radiologically and histologically analyzed. The percentage of new bone and surface density in the pore structure were observed to be approximately 25% and 8 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.