Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34300489›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Survey of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Applied for Prediction of Plant Leaf Diseases.

Vijaypal Singh Dhaka, Sangeeta Vaibhav Meena, Geeta Rani, Deepak Sinwar, Kavita, Muhammad Fazal Ijaz, Marcin Woźniak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
62.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 353 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Optical sorting: past, present and future.Light, science & applications · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Vijaypal Singh DhakaDepartment of Computer and Communication Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Dehmi Kalan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 303007, India.
Sangeeta Vaibhav MeenaDepartment of Computer and Communication Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Dehmi Kalan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 303007, India.
Geeta RaniDepartment of Computer and Communication Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Dehmi Kalan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 303007, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5786-2504
Deepak SinwarDepartment of Computer and Communication Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Dehmi Kalan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 303007, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9597-6206
KavitaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab 140413, India.
Muhammad Fazal IjazDepartment of Intelligent Mechatronics Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5206-272X
Marcin WoźniakFaculty of Applied Mathematics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9073-5347
Manipal University JaipurChandigarh University · INSejong University · KRSilesian University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the modern era, deep learning techniques have emerged as powerful tools in image recognition. Convolutional Neural Networks, one of the deep learning tools, have attained an impressive outcome in this area. Applications such as identifying objects, faces, bones, handwritten digits, and traffic signs signify the importance of Convolutional Neural Networks in the real world. The effectiveness of Convolutional Neural Networks in image recognition motivates the researchers to extend its applications in the field of agriculture for recognition of plant species, yield management, weed detection, soil, and water management, fruit counting, diseases, and pest detection, evaluating the nutrient status of plants, and much more. The availability of voluminous research works in applying deep learning models in agriculture leads to difficulty in selecting a suitable model according to the type of dataset and experimental environment. In this manuscript, the authors present a survey of the existing literature in applying deep Convolutional Neural Networks to predict plant diseases from leaf images. This manuscript presents an exemplary comparison of the pre-processing techniques, Convolutional Neural Network models, frameworks, and optimization techniques applied to detect and classify plant diseases using leaf images as a data set. This manuscript also presents a survey of the datasets and performance metrics used to evaluate the efficacy of models. The manuscript highlights the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques and models proposed in the existing literature. This survey will ease the task of researchers working in the field of applying deep learning techniques for the identification and classification of plant leaf diseases.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesSurveys and Questionnairesagricultureconvolutional neural networksdeep learningdiseaseleafsurvey

Identifiers

PMID34300489
PMCPMC8309553
OpenAlexW3178340391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.