ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Efficient Source Camera Identification with Diversity-Enhanced Patch Selection and Deep Residual Prediction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Deep Learning-Based Source Camera Identification and Device Linking.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Review of Neural Network-Based Image Noise Processing Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Algorithms and Methods for Individual Source Camera Identification: A Survey.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Source Camera Identification Techniques: A Survey.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Source Camera Identification with a Robust Device Fingerprint: Evolution from Image-Based to Video-Based Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Beyond PRNU: Learning Robust Device-Specific Fingerprint for Source Camera Identification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Smartphone Camera Identification from Low-Mid Frequency DCT Coefficients of Dark Images.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Source camera identification has long been a hot topic in the field of image forensics. Besides conventional feature engineering algorithms developed based on studying the traces left upon shooting, several deep-learning-based methods have also emerged recently. However, identification performance is susceptible to image content and is far from satisfactory for small image patches in real demanding applications. In this paper, an efficient patch-level source camera identification method is proposed based on a convolutional neural network. First, in order to obtain improved robustness with reduced training cost, representative patches are selected according to multiple criteria for enhanced diversity in training data. Second, a fine-grained multiscale deep residual prediction module is proposed to reduce the impact of scene content. Finally, a modified VGG network is proposed for source camera identification at brand, model, and instance levels. A more critical patch-level evaluation protocol is also proposed for fair performance comparison. Abundant experimental results show that the proposed method achieves better results as compared with the state-of-the-art algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.