Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34300409›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Classical Machine Learning Versus Deep Learning for the Older Adults Free-Living Activity Classification.

Muhammad Awais, Lorenzo Chiari, Espen A F Ihlen, Jorunn L Helbostad, Luca Palmerini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CNN-LSTM Model for Recognizing Video-Recorded Actions Performed in a Traditional Chinese Exercise.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad AwaisDepartment of Computer Science, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk L39 4QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6421-9245
Lorenzo ChiariDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering Guglielmo Marconi, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2318-4370
Espen A F IhlenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7493 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2469-1809
Jorunn L HelbostadDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7493 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0214-9290
Luca PalmeriniDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering Guglielmo Marconi, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4758-662X

Funding

Norwegian Research Council (FRIMEDBIO) 230435The Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking through the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 820820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity has a strong influence on mental and physical health and is essential in healthy ageing and wellbeing for the ever-growing elderly population. Wearable sensors can provide a reliable and economical measure of activities of daily living (ADLs) by capturing movements through, e.g., accelerometers and gyroscopes. This study explores the potential of using classical machine learning and deep learning approaches to classify the most common ADLs: walking, sitting, standing, and lying. We validate the results on the ADAPT dataset, the most detailed dataset to date of inertial sensor data, synchronised with high frame-rate video labelled data recorded in a free-living environment from older adults living independently. The findings suggest that both approaches can accurately classify ADLs, showing high potential in profiling ADL patterns of the elderly population in free-living conditions. In particular, both long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and Support Vector Machines combined with ReliefF feature selection performed equally well, achieving around 97% F-score in profiling ADLs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningActivities of Daily LivingAgedAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningWalkingclassical machine learningdeep learningfree livingolder adultsphysical activity classificationwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID34300409
PMCPMC8309623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.