ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Emotion-Driven Analysis and Control of Human-Robot Interactions in Collaborative Applications.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Understanding Workers' Well-Being and Cognitive Load in Human-Cobot Collaboration: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- A comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis on collaborative robotics for industry: safety emerging as a core focus.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Pooled it
- Gender and diagnostic differences in children's preferences for social robot design. A mixed-methods study with autistic and neurotypical children.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- Multi-dimensional Dataset of Stress Measurements based on Performance, Behavioural, and Perceptual Indicators.Scientific data · 2024Article
- MOVING: A Multi-Modal Dataset of EEG Signals and Virtual Glove Hand Tracking.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Human Factors Considerations for Quantifiable Human States in Physical Human-Robot Interaction: A Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Behavioral patterns in robotic collaborative assembly: comparing neurotypical and Autism Spectrum Disorder participants.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Classifying human emotions in HRI: applying global optimization model to EEG brain signals.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023Article
- A Review on Human Comfort Factors, Measurements, and Improvements in Human-Robot Collaboration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utilization of robotic systems has been increasing in the last decade. This increase has been derived by the evolvement in the computational capabilities, communication systems, and the information systems of the manufacturing systems which is reflected in the concept of Industry 4.0. Furthermore, the robotics systems are continuously required to address new challenges in the industrial and manufacturing domain, like keeping humans in the loop, among other challenges. Briefly, the keeping humans in the loop concept focuses on closing the gap between humans and machines by introducing a safe and trustworthy environment for the human workers to work side by side with robots and machines. It aims at increasing the engagement of the human as the automation level increases rather than replacing the human, which can be nearly impossible in some applications. Consequently, the collaborative robots (Cobots) have been created to allow physical interaction with the human worker. However, these cobots still lack of recognizing the human emotional state. In this regard, this paper presents an approach for adapting cobot parameters to the emotional state of the human worker. The approach utilizes the Electroencephalography (EEG) technology for digitizing and understanding the human emotional state. Afterwards, the parameters of the cobot are instantly adjusted to keep the human emotional state in a desirable range which increases the confidence and the trust between the human and the cobot. In addition, the paper includes a review on technologies and methods for emotional sensing and recognition. Finally, this approach is tested on an ABB YuMi cobot with commercially available EEG headset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.