ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Early Intervention of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Is a Favorable Factor for Short-Term Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with interstitial lung disease in a tertiary care centre - A randomized controlled trial.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2026Article
- Tweaking the Complex Fibrogenic Role of Lymphocytes in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Article
- Classification of Patients Based on Dyspnea and Desaturation During Exercise in Interstitial Lung Disease.Respiratory care · 2025Article
- Factors influencing long-term outcomes in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) diagnosed through multidisciplinary discussion (MDD): a prospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Multidisciplinary-derived clinical score for accurate prediction of long-term mortality in fibrotic lung disease patients.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Self-management interventions for people with pulmonary fibrosis: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Article
- Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Two Underutilized Approaches with Some Unexpected Benefits.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) have poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We analyzed predictors of short-term improvement of HRQOL after starting pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in moderate to severe FILD patients. This study involved 28 consecutive patients with FILD (20 males, median age of 77.5 years), who participated in PR program of our hospital for >6 weeks. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score and the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) were evaluated before and after PR, and the predictors of efficacy of PR were analyzed. The duration from diagnosis of FILD to start of PR showed a positive correlation with the increase in the SGRQ score, and the baseline SGRQ score showed a negative correlation with increase in the 6MWD. The FILD subtype, modified Medical Research Council score, and treatment history were not associated with the endpoints. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses, starting PR within 514 days after diagnosis of FILD was a significant favorable predictor of improvement in the SGRQ total score more than a minimal clinically important difference of 4. In this study, early intervention of PR and lower SGRQ score were associated with the favorable response to PR. PR for FILD should be initiated early before the disease becomes severe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.