Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34300287›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Lower Limb Lymphedema Patients Can Still Benefit from Supermicrosurgical Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis (LVA) after Vascularized Lymph Node Flap Transfer (VLNT) as Delayed Lymphatic Reconstruction-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Johnson Chia-Shen Yang, Shao-Chun Wu, Akitatsu Hayashi, Wei-Che Lin, Gong-Kai Huang, Pei-Yu Tsai, Peng-Chen Chien, Ching-Hua Hsieh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Overlapping lockup lymphaticovenous anastomosis: A useful addition to supermicrosurgery.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Johnson Chia-Shen YangDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833253, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5783-1003
Shao-Chun WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833253, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0984-6921
Akitatsu HayashiDepartment of Lymphedema Center, Kameda General Hospital, Chiba 296-0041, Japan.
Wei-Che LinCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Gong-Kai HuangCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Pei-Yu TsaiDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833253, Taiwan.
Peng-Chen ChienDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833253, Taiwan.
Ching-Hua HsiehDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833253, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0945-2746
Chang Gung University · TWKameda Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor lymphedema patients who received a vascularized lymph node flap transfer (VLNT) as their primary treatment, what are the treatment options when they seek further improvement? With recent publications supporting the use of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) for treating severe lymphedema, we examined whether LVA could benefit post-VLNT patients seeking further improvement.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study enrolled eight lymphedema patients with nine lymphedematous limbs (one patient suffered from bilateral lower limb lymphedema) who had received VLNT as their primary surgery. Patients with previous LVA, liposuction, excisional therapy, or incomplete data were excluded. LVA was performed on nine lower lymphedematous limbs. Demographic data and intraoperative findings were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative limb volumes were measured with magnetic resonance volumetry. The primary outcome was the limb volume measured 6 months post-LVA.

resultsThe median duration of lymphedema before LVA was 10.5 (4.9-15.3) years. The median waiting time between VLNT and LVA was 41.4 (22.3-97.9) months. The median volume gained in the lymphedematous limb was 3836 (2505-4584) milliliters (mL). The median post-LVA follow-up period was 18 (6-30) months. Significant 6-month and 1-year post-LVA percentage volume reductions were found compared to pre-LVA volume (both

conclusionBased on the results from this study, the authors recommend the use of LVA as a secondary procedure for post-VLNT patients seeking further improvement.

Indexed as

lymphaticovenous anastomosislymphedemalymphovenous bypasssupermicrosurgeryvascularized lymph node transfer

Identifiers

PMID34300287
PMCPMC8305302
OpenAlexW3183892666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.