ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Sex, Lies, and Coronary Artery Disease.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treating Women With Calcified Coronary Arteries Using Intravascular Lithotripsy: Primary Results of the EMPOWER CAD Study.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Unequal disease burdens: exploring the intersection of gender, health and disease dynamics in China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Equity in Modifying Plaque of Women With Undertreated Calcified Coronary Artery Disease: Design and Rationale of EMPOWER CAD study.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Factors Influencing Functional Coronary Artery Ischemia: A Gender-Specific Predictive Model.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidemiological and clinical data have shown clear differences in several aspects of cardiovascular disease, particularly in the case of coronary artery disease (CAD), between men and women, including risk factors, response to therapy, quality of care, and natural history.[...].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.