Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34300133›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Home Smoking Bans and Urinary NNAL Levels to Measure Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Chinese American Household Pairs.

Emiley Chang, Melanie Dove, Anne Saw, Janice Y Tsoh, Lei-Chun Fung, Elisa K Tong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Emiley ChangDepartment of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W. Carson St, Torrance, CA 90502, USA.
Melanie DoveDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of California-Davis, One Shields Ave, Medical Sciences 1-C, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Anne SawDepartment of Psychology, DePaul College of Science and Health, 2219 North Kenmore Ave, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.
Janice Y TsohDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California-San Francisco, 401 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Lei-Chun FungChinatown Public Health Center, San Francisco Department of Public Health, 1490 Mason St, San Francisco, CA 94133, USA.
Elisa K TongDepartment of Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
DePaul University · USSan Francisco Department of Public Health · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001860 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KENYON, NICHOLAS J., LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2016 to 2025
$47.3M
Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR001859 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HOLMES, JAMES F. · 2016 to 2025
$10.1M
HRSA HHS T32HP30037NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001859NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home smoking bans can reduce tobacco smoke exposure, but little is known about the impact for Chinese American household pairs. In this study of 202 household pairs with low acculturation, 53.9% reported a home smoking ban, 31.7% had inconsistent reports, and 14.4% reported no ban. With decreasing home smoking ban enforcement, more nonsmokers had tobacco smoke exposure (66.1%-86.2%) as measured by the tobacco-specific nitrosamine biomarker urine NNAL (4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol). Despite reported bans, about one-quarter of nonsmokers still reported tobacco smoke exposure at home (23.6%-30%) within the past 2 months and three-quarters reported outdoor exposure. In adjusted regression analyses of geometric mean NNAL ratios, nonsmokers in households with no ban had over two times higher levels than nonsmokers in households with a ban: adjusted log NNAL ratio = 2.70 (95% CI 1.21, 6.03). Higher smoker NNAL level and nonsmoker English fluency were also significantly associated with nonsmoker NNAL levels. Nonsmoker levels in households with an inconsistent ban were not significantly different compared to those with a ban. Although home smoking bans were generally associated with lower NNAL levels, tobacco smoke exposure in this immigrant population with low English proficiency was higher than that of the general population. From a health equity standpoint, there is a need for broader implementation and enforcement of comprehensive smoke-free policies.

Indexed as

NitrosaminesSmoke-Free PolicyTobacco Smoke PollutionAsianHumansNon-SmokersNitrosaminesTobacco Smoke PollutionbiomarkerChinese Americanhome smoking banhousehold pairsimmigrant healthNNALtobacco smoke exposuretobacco-specific nitrosamine

Identifiers

PMID34300133
PMCPMC8305615
OpenAlexW3184531383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.