Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34300090›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Productivity, Satisfaction, Work Environment and Health after Relocation to an Activity-Based Flex Office-The Active Office Design Study.

Maria Öhrn, Viktoria Wahlström, Mette S Harder, Maria Nordin, Anita Pettersson-Strömbäck, Christina Bodin Danielsson, David Olsson, Martin Andersson, Lisbeth Slunga Järvholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Physical work environment in an activity-based flex office: a longitudinal case study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Validity of Three Survey Questions for Self-Assessed Sedentary Time.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria ÖhrnDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Viktoria WahlströmDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4656-7606
Mette S HarderUmeå School of Architecture, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Maria NordinDepartment of Psychology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6936-5126
Anita Pettersson-StrömbäckDepartment of Psychology, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Christina Bodin DanielssonThe Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), School of Architecture and the Built Environment, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
David OlssonDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Martin AnderssonDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7222-6402
Lisbeth Slunga JärvholmDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation of activity-based flex offices (AFOs) are becoming increasingly common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an AFO on perceived productivity, satisfaction, work environment and health. Questionnaire data from the longitudinal, quasi-experimental Active Office Design Study was used. The study evaluates a public organization relocating staff to either an AFO or to cell offices. Measures from baseline, 6 and 18 months after relocation, were analyzed. Employees in the AFO experienced a decreased productivity and satisfaction with the office design. Lack of privacy as well as increased noise disturbance, less satisfaction with sit comfort and work posture were reported. Employees in the AFO with work tasks requiring a high degree of concentration experienced lower productivity while those with a high proportion of teamwork rated productivity to be continually high. No significant group differences were found between the two office types in general health, cognitive stress, salutogenic health indicators or pain in the neck, shoulder or back. The study highlights the importance of taking work characteristics into account in the planning and implementation process of an AFO. Flexible and interactive tasks seem more appropriate in an AFO, whereas individual tasks demanding concentration seem less fit.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionEfficiencyHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplaceactivity-based workjob performancelongitudinal studynew ways of workingoccupational healthoffice worker

Identifiers

PMID34300090
PMCPMC8304243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.