Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34300053›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Muhammad Idrees, Sheeba Sawant, Nazira Karodia, Ayesha Rahman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 170 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development of a new recombineering system forSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Draft genome sequencing of aMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome and Secondary Metabolites Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Imaging ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad IdreesFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK.
Sheeba SawantFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK.
Nazira KarodiaFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK.
Ayesha RahmanFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6971-8825

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Staphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiofilm agentsantimicrobial resistancebiofilm formationgene expressionpathogenesisquorum sensingStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID34300053
PMCPMC8304105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.