Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34300016›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Ethical Problems and Moral Distress in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.

Noemi Giannetta, Giulia Villa, Federico Pennestrì, Roberta Sala, Roberto Mordacci, Duilio Fiorenzo Manara

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exploring Professionalism Dilemma and Moral Distress through Medical Students' Eyes: A Mixed-Method Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Understanding Moral Distress among Eldercare Workers: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noemi GiannettaFaculty of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4575-1898
Giulia VillaCenter for Nursing Research and Innovation, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7429-0504
Federico PennestrìFaculty of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Roberta SalaFaculty of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Roberto MordacciFaculty of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Duilio Fiorenzo ManaraCenter for Nursing Research and Innovation, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 1997, nursing ethics research has focused on solving ethical dilemmas, enhancing decision-making strategies, and introducing professional education. Few studies describe the triggers of ethical dilemmas among primary care nurses. The aim of this study was to explore the moral distress and ethical dilemmas among primary care nurses.

methodsA scoping review was performed following Arskey and O'Malley's framework. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus were searched systematically to retrieve relevant titles and abstracts. A temporal filter was applied to focus on the most recent literature (years of 2010-2020). The research was completed on 17 November 2020.

resultsOf 184 articles retrieved, 15 were included in the review. Some (

conclusionFurther research is needed to examine the differences between moral distress triggers and sources of ethical dilemmas among the different care environments, such as primary care and acute care settings.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalMoralsBrazilHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchStress, Psychologicalcommunity care settingethical dilemmasmoral distressnursingprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34300016
PMCPMC8303154
OpenAlexW3187009688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.