Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34299985›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Effect of Flow Rate on a Third-Generation Sub-Ohm Tank Electronic Nicotine Delivery System-Comparison of CORESTA Flow Rates to More Realistic Flow Rates.

Evan Floyd, Sara Greenlee, Toluwanimi Oni, Balaji Sadhasivam, Lurdes Queimado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evan FloydDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Sara GreenleeDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Toluwanimi OniDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Balaji SadhasivamDepartment of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Lurdes QueimadoDepartment of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1106-4873

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Biological impact of exclusive and dual e-cigarette use on oral cancer riskR01CA242168 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI QUEIMADO, LURDES · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
Training for Industrial Hygiene Professionals and ResearchersT03OH008614 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI FLOYD, EVAN LEE · 2014 to 2025
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA242168NIOSH CDC HHS 2T03OH008614-16-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many types of electronic cigarettes (ECs) are currently in use, but the default flow rate used to simulate puffing is centered on tobacco cigarette flow rates. CORESTA offers several methods and technical guides for evaluation of ECs but there are few puffing topography studies focusing on sub-ohm ECs; differences between real-world usage and that found in the literature appear large. This study focuses on how power and flow rate affect the nicotine yield of a sub-ohm EC. A puffing system (Puff3rd) has been designed and used to produce and collect EC aerosol. Nicotine yield was measured by GC-MS at three power levels and four flow rates. Data analysis was conducted in SAS using the MIXED procedure. Power, flow rate, and their interaction were all significant predictors of nicotine yield. Nicotine yield increased with both the vaping power and the puff flow rate with significant interaction of the two. Findings indicate that using the current CORESTA flow rate (1100 mL/min) to evaluate third-generation ECs underestimates nicotine yield and likely overestimates pyrolysis products. Real users are expected to have 2-3× the nicotine dose measured at 1100 mL/min, which could confound epidemiological studies seeking to link nicotine delivery to product satisfaction and acceptability.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingAerosolsNicotinePyrolysisAerosolsNicotineCORESTAelectronic cigarettesflow ratenicotine yieldPMTAspower settings

Identifiers

PMID34299985
PMCPMC8307737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.