Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34299940›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Qualitative Study toward Technologies for Active and Healthy Aging: A Thematic Analysis of Perspectives among Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary End Users.

Margherita Rampioni, Adrian Alexandru Moșoi, Lorena Rossi, Sorin-Aurel Moraru, Dan Rosenberg, Vera Stara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margherita RampioniIRCCS INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, Innovative Models for Ageing Care and Technology, via S. Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9235-9923
Adrian Alexandru MoșoiDepartment of Psychology, Education and Teacher Training, Transilvania University of Brasov, B-dul Eroilor 29, 500036 Brașov, Romania.
Lorena RossiIRCCS INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, Innovative Models for Ageing Care and Technology, via S. Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5688-105X
Sorin-Aurel MoraruDepartment of Automatics and Information Technology, Transilvania University of Brasov, B-dul Eroilor 29, 500036 Brașov, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9500-2604
Dan RosenbergDepartment of Automatics and Information Technology, Transilvania University of Brasov, B-dul Eroilor 29, 500036 Brașov, Romania.
Vera StaraIRCCS INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, Innovative Models for Ageing Care and Technology, via S. Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7536-7606

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is expected that, by 2050, people aged over 60 in 65 nations will constitute 30% of the total population. Healthy aging is at the top of the world political agenda as a possible means for hindering the collapse of care systems. How can ICT/sensing technology meet older people's needs for active and healthy aging? This qualitative study carried out in Italy and Romania in 2020 involved 30 participants: older adults, caregivers, and stakeholders. Based on a user-centered design approach, this study aimed to understand which requirements of ICT/sensing technologies could match people's needs of active and healthy aging. Findings highlighted that ICT/sensing technology needs to focus on six major themes: (1) learnability, (2) security, (3) independence, empowerment, and coaching values, (4) social isolation, (5) impact of habit, culture, and education variables, and (6) personalized solutions. These themes are consistent with the Active Aging framework and the factors that influence perceived usefulness and potential benefits among older adults. Consequently, this study shows how well-known, but still unresolved, issues affect the field of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to promote active and healthy aging. This suggests that the reinforcement of the public health system, especially considering the pandemic effect, requires a concrete and formidable effort from an interdisciplinary research network.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingAgedAgingCommunicationHumansQualitative ResearchTechnologyactive agingcoachingempowermentfocus grouppersonalizationsecuritysocial isolationtechnology for aging wellthinking alouduser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID34299940
PMCPMC8308090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.